Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)
VS
AscensionAscension
Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)

Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)

4650 Sunset Blvd, Los Angeles, CA, US, 90027

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://chla.org/careers
759/1000Fair

Here at CHLA, we believe every child deserves to enjoy all those special moments that childhood has to offer, free from pain and suffering. This is what inspires our staff to be their best—and they’re equipped with everything they need to succeed. If you want to help cr...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:6,859
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
Ascension

Ascension

101 South Hanley Rd., St. Louis, 63105, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.ascension.org/
100/1000Critical

Answering God's call to bring health, healing and hope to all. Ascension is one of the nation’s leading non-profit and Catholic health systems, with a Mission of delivering compassionate, personalized care to all, with special attention to those most vulnerable. In FY...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:66,548
Subsidiaries:28
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)

Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Ascension

Ascension

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Ascension has 2.91% fewer incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Ascension (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Ascension cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)

Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA)

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI542072825
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHI338072625
Ascension

Ascension

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASC1773764792
🔒 Incident : Breach
ASC220051225
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ASC000032225

FAQ

Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) company and Ascension company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) and Ascension, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) and Ascension, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) or Ascension ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) or Ascension ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) and Ascension, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Children's Hospital Los Angeles (CHLA) and Ascension, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8