Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Department of Children and FamiliesDepartment of Children and Families
VS
South African Revenue Service (SARS)South African Revenue Service (SARS)
Department of Children and Families

Department of Children and Families

Darwin Plaza 41 Smith Street, Darwin, 0800, AU

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://families.nt.gov.au/
762/1000Fair

The Department of Children and Families provides support services across child protection, domestic and family violence, and homelessness. As our agency has a broad social purpose, we offer a wide range of career opportunities across the Northern Territory including fr...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:420
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Lehae La Sars, Pretoria, 0001, ZA

Last Update: 29/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.sars.gov.za
795/1000Fair

Its main functions are to: collect and administer all national taxes, duties and levies; collect revenue that may be imposed under any other legislation, as agreed on between SARS and an organ of state or institution entitled to the revenue; provide protection a...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:11,341
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Department of Children and Families

Department of Children and Families

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Department of Children and Families in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for South African Revenue Service (SARS) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Department of Children and Families (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Department of Children and Families cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - South African Revenue Service (SARS) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

South African Revenue Service (SARS) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Department of Children and Families

Department of Children and Families

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
South African Revenue Service (SARS)

South African Revenue Service (SARS)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Department of Children and Families company and South African Revenue Service (SARS) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Department of Children and Families and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Department of Children and Families and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Department of Children and Families or South African Revenue Service (SARS) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Department of Children and Families or South African Revenue Service (SARS) ?
Between Department of Children and Families and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Department of Children and Families and South African Revenue Service (SARS), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-57980
SUMMARY

Authentication bypass using an alternate path or channel in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform tampering over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-56741
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not apply an upper bound to terminal dimensions received via the Telnet NAWS option, and TelnetIO.handleNAWS() in TelnetIO.java:856-879 reads client-supplied width and height as 16-bit unsigned integers and passes values such as 65535x65535 to setTerminalGeometry(), allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly alternate values and trigger continuous expensive rendering work that causes CPU exhaustion and denial of service. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56740
SUMMARY

JLine is a Java library for handling console input. Prior to 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1, the JLine3 Telnet server remote-telnet module does not limit the number of environment variables a client may inject via the Telnet NEW-ENVIRON option, and TelnetIO.readNEVariables() in TelnetIO.java:1127-1180 stores each variable pair in a HashMap held by ConnectionData, allowing an unauthenticated attacker to flood unique variable pairs before the terminating IAC SE byte and exhaust JVM heap memory with an OutOfMemoryError. This issue is fixed in versions 3.30.14, 4.0.16, and 4.2.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-56171
SUMMARY

Exposure of private personal information to an unauthorized actor in Windows RDP allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-54335
SUMMARY

Feathersjs is a framework for creating web APIs and real-time applications with TypeScript or JavaScript. In 5.0.44 and earlier, the _.merge(target, source) utility exported by @feathersjs/commons recursively merges source into target by iterating Object.keys(source). When source was produced by JSON.parse and contains a __proto__, constructor, or prototype key, that key is returned as an own-enumerable property; the recursive merge then resolves target['__proto__'] to Object.prototype and writes attacker-supplied properties onto it, polluting the prototype for all plain objects in the process for the lifetime of the Node process. This issue is fixed in version 5.0.45.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-17
UPDATED
Date2026-07-17
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2