Comparison Overview

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.

VS

Discovery Centre

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.

None
Last Update: 2025-12-01

The Cheyenne Depot Museum is housed in the newly renovated Union Pacific Depot in downtown Cheyenne. The museum tells the story about the establishment of Cheyenne during the construction of the Transcontinental Railroad, the operation of the Union Pacific Railroad and the history of the construction of the Union Pacific Depot.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 3
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Discovery Centre

1215 Lower Water Street, Halifax, B3J3S8, CA
Last Update: 2025-12-01

Discovery Centre is a non-profit, registered charitable organization that is passionate about its mission to bring STEAM (science, technology, engineering, arts and math) to life through fun, interactive learning experiences. From its beginnings as a travelling science show to its spectacular new home on the Halifax Waterfront, Discovery Centre has grown a lot over 30 years of operation. But through it all, Discovery Centre has stayed true to its vision: using its facility, people and passion to demonstrate how STEAM can empower our youth, grow Nova Scotia’s knowledge-based economy and inspire an innovative culture by showcasing our best and brightest.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition: Museums, Historical Sites, and Similar Institutions
Employees: 49
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-discovery-centre.jpeg
Discovery Centre
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Discovery Centre
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. in 2025.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Discovery Centre in 2025.

Incident History — Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Discovery Centre (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Discovery Centre cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/defaultcompany.jpeg
Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc.
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/the-discovery-centre.jpeg
Discovery Centre
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Discovery Centre company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Discovery Centre company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company.

In the current year, Discovery Centre company and Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Discovery Centre company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Discovery Centre company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Discovery Centre company nor Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company nor Discovery Centre company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company nor Discovery Centre company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

Discovery Centre company employs more people globally than Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cheyenne Depot Museum, Inc. nor Discovery Centre holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

vLLM is an inference and serving engine for large language models (LLMs). Prior to 0.11.1, vllm has a critical remote code execution vector in a config class named Nemotron_Nano_VL_Config. When vllm loads a model config that contains an auto_map entry, the config class resolves that mapping with get_class_from_dynamic_module(...) and immediately instantiates the returned class. This fetches and executes Python from the remote repository referenced in the auto_map string. Crucially, this happens even when the caller explicitly sets trust_remote_code=False in vllm.transformers_utils.config.get_config. In practice, an attacker can publish a benign-looking frontend repo whose config.json points via auto_map to a separate malicious backend repo; loading the frontend will silently run the backend’s code on the victim host. This vulnerability is fixed in 0.11.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

fastify-reply-from is a Fastify plugin to forward the current HTTP request to another server. Prior to 12.5.0, by crafting a malicious URL, an attacker could access routes that are not allowed, even though the reply.from is defined for specific routes in @fastify/reply-from. This vulnerability is fixed in 12.5.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17, A Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability has been identified in the Angular Template Compiler. It occurs because the compiler's internal security schema is incomplete, allowing attackers to bypass Angular's built-in security sanitization. Specifically, the schema fails to classify certain URL-holding attributes (e.g., those that could contain javascript: URLs) as requiring strict URL security, enabling the injection of malicious scripts. This vulnerability is fixed in 21.0.2, 20.3.15, and 19.2.17.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Gin-vue-admin is a backstage management system based on vue and gin. In 2.8.6 and earlier, attackers can delete any file on the server at will, causing damage or unavailability of server resources. Attackers can control the 'FileMd5' parameter to delete any file and folder.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Portkey.ai Gateway is a blazing fast AI Gateway with integrated guardrails. Prior to 1.14.0, the gateway determined the destination baseURL by prioritizing the value in the x-portkey-custom-host request header. The proxy route then appends the client-specified path to perform an external fetch. This can be maliciously used by users for SSRF attacks. This vulnerability is fixed in 1.14.0.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X