Comparison Overview
Bajaj Auto Technology Limited

Bajaj Auto Technology Limited
undefined, Pune, undefined, undefined, IN
Last Update: 30/01/2026
Bajaj Auto Technology Ltd. (BATL) pushes the boundaries of innovation, empowering you to think beyond the status quo alongside highly talented teams that cut across motor design, electronics hardware, BMS & embedded software. We welcome you to collaborate in our drive...

Fanatics
95 Morton St, New York, NY, US, 10014
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Fanatics is a leading global digital sports platform. We ignite the passions of global sports fans and maximize the presence and reach for our hundreds of sports partners globally by offering products and services across Fanatics Commerce, Fanatics Collectibles, and Fan...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Bajaj Auto Technology Limited







Fanatics






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Bajaj Auto Technology Limited in 2026.
Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Fanatics in 2026.
Incident History - Bajaj Auto Technology Limited (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Bajaj Auto Technology Limited cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Fanatics (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Fanatics cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Bajaj Auto Technology Limited

Fanatics
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.