Comparison Overview
Cherng Family Trust

Cherng Family Trust
3465 E Foothill Blvd, Pasadena, 91107, US
Last Update: 28/04/2026
Founded in 2001, the Cherng Family Trust is the multi-generational family office and investment firm of Andrew and Peggy Cherng (the founders of Panda Express / Panda Restaurant Group) and their family. The company pursues a family-owned, long-term, flexible and sustai...

Sonae
Maia, Porto, 4470-177, PT
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Sonae exists to create a lasting positive impact on businesses, people, communities and on the planet. Managing a diverse portfolio of businesses in retail, financial services, technology, investments, real estate and telecommunications, Sonae makes the most of its ex...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Cherng Family Trust







Sonae






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cherng Family Trust in 2026.
Incidents vs Investment Management Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sonae in 2026.
Incident History - Cherng Family Trust (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cherng Family Trust cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sonae (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sonae cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Cherng Family Trust

Sonae
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.