Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChinaChina National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina
VS
AkzoNobelAkzoNobel
China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina

China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina

62 Beisihuan Xilu, Haidian District, Beijing, 100080, CN

Last Update: 02/06/2026

View Profile
715/1000Moderate

ChemChina is a state-owned enterprise established on the basis of companies affiliated to the former Ministry of the Chemical Industry of China. It ranks 164th on the 2020 Fortune Global 500 list. It has 148,000 employees, 87,000 of which work overseas. Strategically o...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:9
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

Christian Neefestraat 2, Amsterdam, Noord Holland, NL, 1077 WW

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 0 and 549
http://www.akzonobel.com
318/1000Critical

Since 1792, we’ve been supplying the innovative paints and coatings that help to color people’s lives and protect what matters most. Our world class portfolio of brands – including Dulux, International, Sikkens and Interpon – is trusted by customers around the globe. We...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:Chemical Manufacturing
Employees:31,151
Subsidiaries:10
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina

China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina has 60.78% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

AkzoNobel has 94.17% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina (X = Date, Y = Severity)

China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - AkzoNobel (X = Date, Y = Severity)

AkzoNobel cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina

China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
CHESYN1780417682
AkzoNobel

AkzoNobel

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZINSHYDPOWWES1775047452
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZ1772649747
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
AKZ1772583818

FAQ

Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina company and AkzoNobel company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina and AkzoNobel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina and AkzoNobel, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina or AkzoNobel ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina or AkzoNobel ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina and AkzoNobel, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between China National Chemical Corporation - ChemChina and AkzoNobel, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3