Comparison Overview

Check Point Software

VS

Cybereason

Check Point Software

100 Oracle Pkwy, Suite 800, Redwood City, California, US, 94065
Last Update: 2025-09-17 (UTC)
Between 800 and 900
http://www.checkpoint.com

Strong

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a leading protector of digital trust, utilizing AI-powered cyber security solutions to safeguard over 100,000 organizations globally. Through its Infinity Platform and an open garden ecosystem, Check Point’s prevention-first approach delivers industry-leading security efficacy while reducing risk. Employing a hybrid mesh network architecture with SASE at its core, the Infinity Platform unifies the management of on-premises, cloud, and workspace environments to offer flexibility, simplicity and scale for enterprises and service providers.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 8,329
Subsidiaries: 11
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
3

Cybereason

1250 Prospect St, San Diego, California, 92037, US
Last Update: 2025-05-05 (UTC)

Moderate

Between 600 and 700
http://www.cybereason.com

Cybereason is the leader in future-ready attack protection, partnering with Defenders to end attacks at the endpoint, in the cloud, and across the entire enterprise ecosystem. Only the AI-driven Cybereason Defense Platform provides predictive prevention, detection, and response that is undefeated against modern ransomware and advanced attack techniques. The Cybereason MalOp™ instantly delivers context-rich attack intelligence across every affected device, user, and system with unparalleled speed and accuracy. Cybereason turns threat data into actionable decisions at the speed of business. Cybereason is a privately held international company headquartered in La Jolla, San Diego with customers in more than 40 countries.

NAICS: 541514
NAICS Definition: Others
Employees: 679
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/check-point-software-technologies.jpeg
Check Point Software
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybereason.jpeg
Cybereason
—
ISO 27001
Not verified
—
SOC 2
Not verified
—
GDPR
No public badge
—
PCI DSS
No public badge
Compliance Summary
Check Point Software
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Cybereason
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

Check Point Software has 417.24% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cybereason in 2025.

Incident History — Check Point Software (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Check Point Software cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Cybereason (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cybereason cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/check-point-software-technologies.jpeg
Check Point Software
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Cyber Attack
Motivation: Financial Gain, Data Theft, Disruption
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Ransomware
Motivation: financial gain, disruption, data theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 4/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Account
Motivation: Data Theft
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cybereason.jpeg
Cybereason
Incidents

Date Detected: 7/2024
Type:Ransomware
Attack Vector: SEO manipulation, malicious ZIP archives, Cobalt Strike binary
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Check Point Software company company demonstrates a stronger AI risk posture compared to Cybereason company company, reflecting its advanced AI governance and monitoring frameworks.

Check Point Software company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Cybereason company.

In the current year, Check Point Software company has reported more cyber incidents than Cybereason company.

Both Cybereason company and Check Point Software company have confirmed experiencing at least one ransomware attack.

Check Point Software company has disclosed at least one data breach, while the other Cybereason company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Check Point Software company has reported targeted cyberattacks, while Cybereason company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Check Point Software company nor Cybereason company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Check Point Software company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cybereason company.

Check Point Software company employs more people globally than Cybereason company, reflecting its scale as a Computer and Network Security.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

PyVista provides 3D plotting and mesh analysis through an interface for the Visualization Toolkit (VTK). Version 0.46.3 of the PyVista Project is vulnerable to remote code execution via dependency confusion. Two pieces of code use`--extra-index-url`. But when `--extra-index-url` is used, pip always checks for the PyPI index first, and then the external index. One package listed in the code is not published in PyPI. If an attacker publishes a package with higher version in PyPI, the malicious code from the attacker controlled package may be pulled, leading to remote code execution and a supply chain attack. As of time of publication, a patched version is unavailable.

Published
Date
2025-10-06
Updated
Date
2025-10-06
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

KUNO CMS is a fully deployable full-stack blog application. In versions prior to 1.3.15, an SSRF (Server-Side Request Forgery) vulnerability exists in the Media module of the Kuno CMS administrative panel. A logged-in administrator can upload a specially crafted SVG file containing an external image reference, causing the server to initiate an outgoing connection to an arbitrary external URL. This can lead to information disclosure or internal network probing. Version 1.3.15 contains a fix for the issue.

Published
Date
2025-10-06
Updated
Date
2025-10-06
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 5.1
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:L/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The Profile widget in Liferay Portal 7.4.0 through 7.4.3.111, and older unsupported versions, and Liferay DXP 2023.Q4.0 through 2023.Q4.5, 2023.Q3.1 through 2023.Q3.8, 7.4 GA through update 92, and older unsupported versions uses a user’s name in the “Content-Disposition” header, which allows remote authenticated users to change the file extension when a vCard file is downloaded.

Published
Date
2025-10-06
Updated
Date
2025-10-06
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 4.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:A/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

The YoSmart YoLink API through 2025-10-02 uses an endpoint URL that is derived from a device's MAC address along with an MD5 hash of non-secret information, such as a key that begins with cf50.

Published
Date
2025-10-06
Updated
Date
2025-10-06
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:N
References
Description

The YoSmart YoLink application through 2025-10-02 has session tokens with unexpectedly long lifetimes.

Published
Date
2025-10-06
Updated
Date
2025-10-06
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 3.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
References