ISO 27001 Certificate
SOC 1 Type I Certificate
SOC 2 Type II Certificate
PCI DSS
HIPAA
RGPD
Internal validation & live display
Multiple badges & continuous verification
Faster underwriting decisions
ISOSOC2 Type 1SOC2 Type 2PCI DSSHIPAAGDPR

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a leading protector of digital trust, utilizing AI-powered cyber security solutions to safeguard over 100,000 organizations globally. Through its Infinity Platform and an open garden ecosystem, Check Point’s prevention-first approach delivers industry-leading security efficacy while reducing risk. Employing a hybrid mesh network architecture with SASE at its core, the Infinity Platform unifies the management of on-premises, cloud, and workspace environments to offer flexibility, simplicity and scale for enterprises and service providers.

Check Point Software A.I CyberSecurity Scoring

CPS

Company Details

Linkedin ID:

check-point-software-technologies

Employees number:

8,329

Number of followers:

391,900

NAICS:

541514

Industry Type:

Computer and Network Security

Homepage:

checkpoint.com

IP Addresses:

0

Company ID:

CHE_2334393

Scan Status:

In-progress

AI scoreCPS Risk Score (AI oriented)

Between 600 and 649

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/check-point-software-technologies.jpeg
CPS Computer and Network Security
Updated:
  • Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
  • Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
globalscoreCPS Global Score (TPRM)

XXXX

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/check-point-software-technologies.jpeg
CPS Computer and Network Security
  • Instant access to detailed risk factors
  • Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
  • Vulnerabilities
  • Findings

CPS Company CyberSecurity News & History

Past Incidents
4
Attack Types
3
EntityTypeSeverityImpactSeenBlog DetailsIncident DetailsView
Check PointBreach8534/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A hacker using the alias CoreInjection claims to have obtained sensitive data from Check Point, including user credentials, employee contract details, and internal network maps. Check Point downplays the incident, asserting it relates to a limited and previously addressed breach. The breach supposedly involved just one account with restricted portal access and did not extend to customers' systems, production, or security architecture. Despite the company's stance, security experts like Hudson Rock CTO Alon Gal suggest Check Point may have had an administrator account compromised, indicating a serious breach with potential internal company data leaks.

Check Point (as referenced in the article, representing a generalized case of affected organizations)Breach85410/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The article highlights a systemic issue across **66% of organizations** that experienced **cloud security breaches** in the past year, with **91% of incidents remaining undetected for over an hour** and **62% taking more than 24 hours to remediate**. Prolonged exposure allowed attackers to escalate privileges, exfiltrate data, or deploy ransomware, leading to **reputational damage, regulatory fines (e.g., GDPR penalties), and operational disruptions**. Causes included **misconfigured cloud storage, overly permissive access controls, disabled logging (e.g., AWS CloudTrail), and alert fatigue**—exacerbated by fragmented hybrid environments. The delayed response enabled adversaries to **maintain persistence, perform account takeovers, and exploit cloud resources for malicious purposes**, compounding financial and legal risks. While no single company is named, the pattern reflects **widespread vulnerabilities in cloud security postures**, with breaches often escalating from initial access to **data theft or system compromise** before mitigation.

Check Point Research (Education Sector - India)Cyber Attack8548/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In August 2025, the **education sector in India**—highlighted by Check Point Research—faced an average of **4,178 cyberattacks per organization weekly**, marking a **13% year-on-year increase**. The sector’s rapid digitization, coupled with chronic underfunding in cybersecurity, expanded its attack surface, making it a prime target for threat actors. While the report did not specify the exact nature of each attack, the scale and frequency suggest **data breaches, ransomware, or disruptive cyberattacks** aimed at exploiting vulnerable systems. Given the sector’s role in handling **student records, financial aid data, and research intellectual property**, compromises could lead to **financial fraud, reputational damage, or operational disruptions** (e.g., halting online classes or exam systems).The attacks align with broader trends where **education globally remains the most targeted sector**, with India’s volume surpassing the worldwide average (1,994 attacks/week). Though no specific incident was detailed, the pattern implies **high-severity threats**, potentially involving **phishing, malware, or ransomware campaigns** designed to extract sensitive data or cripple institutional infrastructure. The lack of robust defenses exacerbates risks, increasing the likelihood of **prolonged outages, data leaks, or financial losses**—directly impacting students, faculty, and administrative operations.

Check Point Research (hypothetical victim: an unnamed US educational institution)Ransomware10051/2025
Rankiteo Explanation :
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: An unnamed educational institution in the US fell victim to a **ransomware attack** amid a **41% global surge in cyberactivity targeting schools** (Jan–Jul 2025). The attack, part of a broader trend where US institutions saw a **67% year-on-year increase**, encrypted critical systems including student records, financial aid databases, and research data. The breach disrupted operations for weeks, forcing cancellations of online classes and delaying admissions processing. While no direct evidence of data exfiltration was confirmed, the attackers demanded a **multi-million-dollar ransom**, threatening to leak sensitive student and faculty information if unpaid. The institution faced **reputational damage** as local media covered the incident, and parents raised concerns over data privacy. Recovery costs—including system restoration, legal fees, and cybersecurity upgrades—exceeded **$5 million**, straining the institution’s budget. The attack underscored the education sector’s vulnerability, now the **most targeted globally**, with ransomware groups exploiting underfunded IT defenses.

Check Point
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 3
Seen: 4/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with internal employee data leaks

Description: A hacker using the alias CoreInjection claims to have obtained sensitive data from Check Point, including user credentials, employee contract details, and internal network maps. Check Point downplays the incident, asserting it relates to a limited and previously addressed breach. The breach supposedly involved just one account with restricted portal access and did not extend to customers' systems, production, or security architecture. Despite the company's stance, security experts like Hudson Rock CTO Alon Gal suggest Check Point may have had an administrator account compromised, indicating a serious breach with potential internal company data leaks.

Check Point (as referenced in the article, representing a generalized case of affected organizations)
Breach
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 10/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: The article highlights a systemic issue across **66% of organizations** that experienced **cloud security breaches** in the past year, with **91% of incidents remaining undetected for over an hour** and **62% taking more than 24 hours to remediate**. Prolonged exposure allowed attackers to escalate privileges, exfiltrate data, or deploy ransomware, leading to **reputational damage, regulatory fines (e.g., GDPR penalties), and operational disruptions**. Causes included **misconfigured cloud storage, overly permissive access controls, disabled logging (e.g., AWS CloudTrail), and alert fatigue**—exacerbated by fragmented hybrid environments. The delayed response enabled adversaries to **maintain persistence, perform account takeovers, and exploit cloud resources for malicious purposes**, compounding financial and legal risks. While no single company is named, the pattern reflects **widespread vulnerabilities in cloud security postures**, with breaches often escalating from initial access to **data theft or system compromise** before mitigation.

Check Point Research (Education Sector - India)
Cyber Attack
Severity: 85
Impact: 4
Seen: 8/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks

Description: In August 2025, the **education sector in India**—highlighted by Check Point Research—faced an average of **4,178 cyberattacks per organization weekly**, marking a **13% year-on-year increase**. The sector’s rapid digitization, coupled with chronic underfunding in cybersecurity, expanded its attack surface, making it a prime target for threat actors. While the report did not specify the exact nature of each attack, the scale and frequency suggest **data breaches, ransomware, or disruptive cyberattacks** aimed at exploiting vulnerable systems. Given the sector’s role in handling **student records, financial aid data, and research intellectual property**, compromises could lead to **financial fraud, reputational damage, or operational disruptions** (e.g., halting online classes or exam systems).The attacks align with broader trends where **education globally remains the most targeted sector**, with India’s volume surpassing the worldwide average (1,994 attacks/week). Though no specific incident was detailed, the pattern implies **high-severity threats**, potentially involving **phishing, malware, or ransomware campaigns** designed to extract sensitive data or cripple institutional infrastructure. The lack of robust defenses exacerbates risks, increasing the likelihood of **prolonged outages, data leaks, or financial losses**—directly impacting students, faculty, and administrative operations.

Check Point Research (hypothetical victim: an unnamed US educational institution)
Ransomware
Severity: 100
Impact: 5
Seen: 1/2025
Blog:
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization’s existence

Description: An unnamed educational institution in the US fell victim to a **ransomware attack** amid a **41% global surge in cyberactivity targeting schools** (Jan–Jul 2025). The attack, part of a broader trend where US institutions saw a **67% year-on-year increase**, encrypted critical systems including student records, financial aid databases, and research data. The breach disrupted operations for weeks, forcing cancellations of online classes and delaying admissions processing. While no direct evidence of data exfiltration was confirmed, the attackers demanded a **multi-million-dollar ransom**, threatening to leak sensitive student and faculty information if unpaid. The institution faced **reputational damage** as local media covered the incident, and parents raised concerns over data privacy. Recovery costs—including system restoration, legal fees, and cybersecurity upgrades—exceeded **$5 million**, straining the institution’s budget. The attack underscored the education sector’s vulnerability, now the **most targeted globally**, with ransomware groups exploiting underfunded IT defenses.

Ailogo

CPS Company Scoring based on AI Models

Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
Incident Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan

A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months

🔒
A.I. Risk Score Predictions locked
Access Monitoring Plan
statics

Underwriter Stats for CPS

Incidents vs Computer and Network Security Industry Average (This Year)

Check Point Software has 497.01% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)

Check Point Software has 412.82% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident Types CPS vs Computer and Network Security Industry Avg (This Year)

Check Point Software reported 4 incidents this year: 1 cyber attacks, 1 ransomware, 0 vulnerabilities, 2 data breaches, compared to industry peers with at least 1 incident.

Incident History — CPS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CPS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

CPS Company Subsidiaries

SubsidiaryImage

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. is a leading protector of digital trust, utilizing AI-powered cyber security solutions to safeguard over 100,000 organizations globally. Through its Infinity Platform and an open garden ecosystem, Check Point’s prevention-first approach delivers industry-leading security efficacy while reducing risk. Employing a hybrid mesh network architecture with SASE at its core, the Infinity Platform unifies the management of on-premises, cloud, and workspace environments to offer flexibility, simplicity and scale for enterprises and service providers.

Loading...
similarCompanies

CPS Similar Companies

Palo Alto Networks

Palo Alto Networks, the global cybersecurity leader, is shaping the cloud-centric future with technology that is transforming the way people and organizations operate. Our mission is to be the cybersecurity partner of choice, protecting our digital way of life. We help address the world's greatest s

CrowdStrike

CrowdStrike (Nasdaq: CRWD), a global cybersecurity leader, has redefined modern security with the world’s most advanced cloud-native platform for protecting critical areas of enterprise risk — endpoints and cloud workloads, identity and data. Powered by the CrowdStrike Security Cloud and world-clas

NETWORK-SECURITY-SOLUTIONS

## Our core business We manage linux / unix server infrastructures and build the efficient and secure networking environments using hardware cutting edge technologies suited to the needs of the project and the client. We believe in quality, opposed to quantity. Our company consists of highly

newsone

CPS CyberSecurity News

December 09, 2025 01:17 AM
Check Point Targets Enterprise Ai cybersecurity And Zero Trust With Quantum Firewall Release

Check Point Software Technologies has rolled out a major update to its Quantum Firewall Software, introducing 20 new features aimed at...

December 04, 2025 08:00 AM
Israeli Cybersecurity Firm Check Point Secures $1.8B

Check Point Software Technologies, a leading Israeli cybersecurity company, has issued its first convertible bond and raised a total of...

December 03, 2025 08:00 AM
Check Point Software Technologies Named a Leader in Gartner Magic Quadrant for Email Security

Check Point® Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ: CHKP), a pioneer and global leader of cyber security solutions, announces that it has been...

December 02, 2025 08:00 AM
Is Check Point Still Attractive After Cybersecurity Spending Surge And Mixed Valuation Signals In 2025

If you are wondering whether Check Point Software Technologies is still worth buying at today's price, or if most of the upside is already...

November 28, 2025 08:44 AM
Check Point expands sports cybersecurity

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. delivered robust performance, fueled by elevated demand for its expanding security portfolio and...

November 19, 2025 08:00 AM
Check Point Infinity gains IRAP clearance for government use

Check Point Software Technologies' Infinity cloud security platform has gained IRAP clearance, enabling use by Australian government...

November 17, 2025 08:00 AM
Check Point’s SWOT analysis: cybersecurity stock navigates refresh cycles amid market shifts

Check Point Software Technologies Ltd. (NASDAQ:CHKP) continues to navigate the evolving cybersecurity landscape with a mix of established...

November 14, 2025 08:00 AM
Kranot Hishtalmut Loads Up on CheckPoint Software Technologies Stock With Nearly 87,000 Shares

The new Check Point Software position represents a relatively small position in a portfolio of 60 holdings.

November 11, 2025 08:00 AM
Check Point Software Technologies completes acquisition of Lakera to secure the world’s AI transformation -

Check Point Software Technologies has officially completed its acquisition of Lakera, the Zurich-based AI-native security pioneer.

faq

Frequently Asked Questions

Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.

CPS CyberSecurity History Information

Official Website of Check Point Software

The official website of Check Point Software is http://www.checkpoint.com.

Check Point Software’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 618, reflecting their Poor security posture.

How many security badges does Check Point Software’ have ?

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.

Does Check Point Software have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.

Does Check Point Software have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Does Check Point Software comply with GDPR ?

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software is not listed as GDPR compliant.

Does Check Point Software have PCI DSS certification ?

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.

Does Check Point Software comply with HIPAA ?

According to Rankiteo, Check Point Software is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.

Does Check Point Software have ISO 27001 certification ?

According to Rankiteo,Check Point Software is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.

Industry Classification of Check Point Software

Check Point Software operates primarily in the Computer and Network Security industry.

Number of Employees at Check Point Software

Check Point Software employs approximately 8,329 people worldwide.

Subsidiaries Owned by Check Point Software

Check Point Software presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.

Check Point Software’s LinkedIn Followers

Check Point Software’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 391,900 followers.

NAICS Classification of Check Point Software

Check Point Software is classified under the NAICS code 541514, which corresponds to Others.

Check Point Software’s Presence on Crunchbase

Yes, Check Point Software has an official profile on Crunchbase, which can be accessed here: https://www.crunchbase.com/organization/check-point.

Check Point Software’s Presence on LinkedIn

Yes, Check Point Software maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/check-point-software-technologies.

Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Check Point Software

As of December 23, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Check Point Software has experienced 4 cybersecurity incidents.

Number of Peer and Competitor Companies

Check Point Software has an estimated 3,175 peer or competitor companies worldwide.

What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Check Point Software ?

Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Cyber Attack, Ransomware and Breach.

How does Check Point Software detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?

Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an containment measures with revoking iam roles, containment measures with detaching compromised instances from networks, containment measures with isolating affected cloud assets, and remediation measures with regular cloud configuration audits, remediation measures with penetration testing, remediation measures with enabling/configuring logging (aws cloudtrail, azure monitor), remediation measures with adopting zero trust principles (least privilege, continuous validation), and recovery measures with tabletop exercises for cloud incident scenarios, recovery measures with investment in cloud security training, recovery measures with unified monitoring tools (aws guardduty, azure defender, google cloud security command center), and and .

Incident Details

Can you provide details on each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach

Title: Check Point Data Breach

Description: A hacker using the alias CoreInjection claims to have obtained sensitive data from Check Point, including user credentials, employee contract details, and internal network maps. Check Point downplays the incident, asserting it relates to a limited and previously addressed breach. The breach supposedly involved just one account with restricted portal access and did not extend to customers' systems, production, or security architecture. Despite the company's stance, security experts like Hudson Rock CTO Alon Gal suggest Check Point may have had an administrator account compromised, indicating a serious breach with potential internal company data leaks.

Type: Data Breach

Attack Vector: Compromised Account

Vulnerability Exploited: Account Compromise

Threat Actor: CoreInjection

Motivation: Data Theft

Incident : cyberattack

Title: Global Surge in Cyberattacks on Educational Institutions (2025)

Description: A study by Check Point Research reveals a 41% year-on-year (YoY) increase in cyberattacks on educational facilities between January and July 2025. The US saw the steepest rise at 67% YoY, consolidating the education sector as the most attacked globally. This trend aligns with broader cybersecurity challenges, including a 78% ransomware targeting rate across companies in the past year, with severe consequences for high-profile breaches.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-07-31

Type: cyberattack

Motivation: financial gaindisruptiondata theft

Incident : Cyberattacks (General)

Title: Surge in Cyberattacks Targeting Indian Organizations in August 2025

Description: Organisations in India witnessed an average of 3,237 cyberattacks per week in August 2025, with the education sector being the top target, followed by government and consumer goods and services. The education sector globally experienced 4,178 weekly attacks per organisation, marking a 13% year-on-year increase. The digitisation of education and underfunded cybersecurity defenses contributed to its vulnerability. Other heavily targeted sectors in India included construction and engineering, telecommunications, IT, energy and utilities, financial services, and biotech/pharma. Globally, education, telecommunications, government, and healthcare were the most affected. Africa reported the highest attack volume (3,239 weekly), followed by India (3,237), Asia-Pacific (2,877), and Latin America (2,865). Europe and North America saw YoY increases of 13% and 20%, respectively, with ransomware driving the surge in the US (54% of global cases).

Date Detected: 2025-08-01

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-08-31

Type: Cyberattacks (General)

Motivation: Financial GainData TheftDisruption

Incident : Cloud Security Breach

Title: Undetected Cloud Security Breaches and Delayed Response Trends (2025)

Description: Research from Check Point’s 2025 Cloud Security Report reveals that nearly two-thirds of organizations experienced a cloud security incident in the past year, with only 9% of breaches detected within the first hour and 6% remediated within the same timeframe. Key causes include alert fatigue, fragmented tools, misconfigured storage, overly permissive access controls, and lack of proper logging (e.g., AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor). Consequences include prolonged adversary access, data theft, operational disruptions (e.g., ransomware), regulatory fines (e.g., GDPR), and reputational damage. Mitigation strategies emphasize zero trust, unified monitoring tools (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender), regular audits, and incident response planning tailored to cloud environments.

Date Publicly Disclosed: 2025-01-01

Type: Cloud Security Breach

Attack Vector: Misconfigured Cloud StorageOverly Permissive Access ControlsLack of Logging/Monitoring (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor)Alert Fatigue (Buried Critical Warnings)Legacy Perimeter Defenses Incompatible with Cloud ScaleMulti-Cloud Complexity (Visibility Gaps)Account TakeoverPrivilege EscalationCommand and Control (C2) Tactics

Vulnerability Exploited: Improper IAM PoliciesUnpatched Cloud ServicesDefault or Weak CredentialsExposed API KeysLack of Network Segmentation in CloudInsufficient Conditional Access Controls

Motivation: Data TheftFinancial Gain (e.g., Ransomware)EspionageDisruption of Services

What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?

Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.

How does the company identify the attack vectors used in incidents ?

Identification of Attack Vectors: The company identifies the attack vectors used in incidents through Misconfigured Cloud StorageExposed APIsWeak/Default Credentials.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the impact of each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CHE417040125

Data Compromised: User credentials, Employee contract details, Internal network maps

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Operational Impact: high (sector-wide disruption)

Brand Reputation Impact: severe (education sector reputation at risk)

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Operational Impact: High (sector-wide disruptions, especially in education and government)

Brand Reputation Impact: Moderate to High (sectoral trust erosion, especially in education)

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Downtime: True

Operational Impact: Project DelaysService DisruptionsResource Exploitation for Malicious Purposes (e.g., Ransomware)

Legal Liabilities: GDPR Fines (UK/EU)Regulatory Penalties for Personal Data Breaches

Identity Theft Risk: True

What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?

Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are User Credentials, Employee Contract Details, Internal Network Maps, , Customer Data, Personal Data (Pii), Sensitive Business Information and .

Which entities were affected by each incident ?

Incident : Data Breach CHE417040125

Entity Name: Check Point

Entity Type: Company

Industry: Cybersecurity

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Entity Type: educational institution

Industry: education

Location: APACAfricaEuropeLatin AmericaNorth America

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Education Sector (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Education

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Government Sector (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Government

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Consumer Goods and Services (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Consumer Goods/Services

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Construction and Engineering (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Construction/Engineering

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Telecommunications (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Telecommunications

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Information Technology (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: IT

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Energy and Utilities (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Energy/Utilities

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Financial Services (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Financial Services

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Biotech and Pharma (India)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Biotech/Pharmaceuticals

Location: India

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Education Sector (Global)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Education

Location: Global

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Telecommunications (Global)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Telecommunications

Location: Global

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Government (Global)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Government

Location: Global

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Entity Name: Healthcare and Medical Services (Global)

Entity Type: Industry Sector

Industry: Healthcare

Location: Global

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Entity Type: Enterprise Organizations

Location: Global

Size: 62% of surveyed enterprises (per Check Point 2025 Report)

Response to the Incidents

What measures were taken in response to each incident ?

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Containment Measures: Revoking IAM RolesDetaching Compromised Instances from NetworksIsolating Affected Cloud Assets

Remediation Measures: Regular Cloud Configuration AuditsPenetration TestingEnabling/Configuring Logging (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor)Adopting Zero Trust Principles (Least Privilege, Continuous Validation)

Recovery Measures: Tabletop Exercises for Cloud Incident ScenariosInvestment in Cloud Security TrainingUnified Monitoring Tools (AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender, Google Cloud Security Command Center)

Network Segmentation: True

Data Breach Information

What type of data was compromised in each breach ?

Incident : Data Breach CHE417040125

Type of Data Compromised: User credentials, Employee contract details, Internal network maps

Sensitivity of Data: High

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Type of Data Compromised: Customer data, Personal data (pii), Sensitive business information

Sensitivity of Data: High (Potential GDPR Violation)

What measures does the company take to prevent data exfiltration ?

Prevention of Data Exfiltration: The company takes the following measures to prevent data exfiltration: Regular Cloud Configuration Audits, Penetration Testing, Enabling/Configuring Logging (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor), Adopting Zero Trust Principles (Least Privilege, Continuous Validation), .

How does the company handle incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) ?

Handling of PII Incidents: The company handles incidents involving personally identifiable information (PII) through by revoking iam roles, detaching compromised instances from networks, isolating affected cloud assets and .

Ransomware Information

How does the company recover data encrypted by ransomware ?

Data Recovery from Ransomware: The company recovers data encrypted by ransomware through Tabletop Exercises for Cloud Incident Scenarios, Investment in Cloud Security Training, Unified Monitoring Tools (AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender, Google Cloud Security Command Center), .

Regulatory Compliance

Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Regulations Violated: UK General Data Protection Regulation (GDPR),

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What lessons were learned from each incident ?

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Lessons Learned: The education sector remains a prime target for cybercriminals due to often underfunded cybersecurity infrastructure. Proactive measures, including threat intelligence sharing, staff training, and investment in advanced defenses (e.g., zero-trust architectures), are critical to mitigating risks.

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Lessons Learned: The education sector's rapid digitisation and underfunded cybersecurity defenses have made it a prime target for cyberattacks. Organizations must prioritize cyber resilience investments, especially in high-risk sectors like education, government, and healthcare. Regional disparities in attack volumes highlight the need for tailored cybersecurity strategies based on local threat landscapes.

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Lessons Learned: Fragmented tools and alert fatigue hinder detection; unified monitoring is critical., Legacy perimeter defenses are ineffective for cloud-scale threats; zero trust and least privilege access are essential., Multi-cloud complexity increases visibility gaps; centralized control and audits are necessary., Proactive measures (e.g., configuration audits, penetration testing) reduce exploitability., Incident response plans must be cloud-specific, regularly tested, and include all stakeholders.

What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Recommendations: Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities.Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities.

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Recommendations: Increase cybersecurity funding and resources for underprotected sectors like education and government., Implement robust incident response plans and third-party threat intelligence sharing (e.g., Check Point Research)., Enhance employee training and awareness programs to mitigate human-error risks., Adopt proactive measures like adaptive behavioral WAFs, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring., Strengthen regulatory compliance and cross-border collaboration to address global cyber threats.Increase cybersecurity funding and resources for underprotected sectors like education and government., Implement robust incident response plans and third-party threat intelligence sharing (e.g., Check Point Research)., Enhance employee training and awareness programs to mitigate human-error risks., Adopt proactive measures like adaptive behavioral WAFs, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring., Strengthen regulatory compliance and cross-border collaboration to address global cyber threats.Increase cybersecurity funding and resources for underprotected sectors like education and government., Implement robust incident response plans and third-party threat intelligence sharing (e.g., Check Point Research)., Enhance employee training and awareness programs to mitigate human-error risks., Adopt proactive measures like adaptive behavioral WAFs, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring., Strengthen regulatory compliance and cross-border collaboration to address global cyber threats.Increase cybersecurity funding and resources for underprotected sectors like education and government., Implement robust incident response plans and third-party threat intelligence sharing (e.g., Check Point Research)., Enhance employee training and awareness programs to mitigate human-error risks., Adopt proactive measures like adaptive behavioral WAFs, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring., Strengthen regulatory compliance and cross-border collaboration to address global cyber threats.Increase cybersecurity funding and resources for underprotected sectors like education and government., Implement robust incident response plans and third-party threat intelligence sharing (e.g., Check Point Research)., Enhance employee training and awareness programs to mitigate human-error risks., Adopt proactive measures like adaptive behavioral WAFs, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring., Strengthen regulatory compliance and cross-border collaboration to address global cyber threats.

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Recommendations: Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation, and network segmentation., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays.

What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?

Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are The education sector remains a prime target for cybercriminals due to often underfunded cybersecurity infrastructure. Proactive measures, including threat intelligence sharing, staff training, and investment in advanced defenses (e.g., zero-trust architectures), are critical to mitigating risks.The education sector's rapid digitisation and underfunded cybersecurity defenses have made it a prime target for cyberattacks. Organizations must prioritize cyber resilience investments, especially in high-risk sectors like education, government, and healthcare. Regional disparities in attack volumes highlight the need for tailored cybersecurity strategies based on local threat landscapes.Fragmented tools and alert fatigue hinder detection; unified monitoring is critical.,Legacy perimeter defenses are ineffective for cloud-scale threats; zero trust and least privilege access are essential.,Multi-cloud complexity increases visibility gaps; centralized control and audits are necessary.,Proactive measures (e.g., configuration audits, penetration testing) reduce exploitability.,Incident response plans must be cloud-specific, regularly tested, and include all stakeholders.

References

Where can I find more information about each incident ?

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Source: Check Point Research

Date Accessed: 2025-07-31

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Source: Check Point Research

Date Accessed: 2025-08-31

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Source: The Hindu

Date Accessed: 2025-08-31

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Source: Check Point’s 2025 Cloud Security Report

Date Accessed: 2025-01-01

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Source: ITPro Article: 'Why cloud breaches are going undetected'

Date Accessed: 2025-01-01

Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?

Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Check Point ResearchDate Accessed: 2025-07-31, and Source: Check Point ResearchDate Accessed: 2025-08-31, and Source: The HinduDate Accessed: 2025-08-31, and Source: Check Point’s 2025 Cloud Security ReportDate Accessed: 2025-01-01, and Source: ITPro Article: 'Why cloud breaches are going undetected'Date Accessed: 2025-01-01.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the investigation for each incident ?

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Investigation Status: ongoing (sector-wide trend analysis)

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Investigation Status: Ongoing (sector-wide analysis by Check Point Research)

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Investigation Status: Ongoing (Industry-Wide Trend Analysis)

Initial Access Broker

How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

High Value Targets: Student Records, Research Data, Financial Systems,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Student Records, Research Data, Financial Systems,

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

High Value Targets: Education Sector, Government Entities,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Education Sector, Government Entities,

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Entry Point: Misconfigured Cloud Storage, Exposed Apis, Weak/Default Credentials,

High Value Targets: Customer Data, Iam Roles, Sensitive Business Systems,

Data Sold on Dark Web: Customer Data, Iam Roles, Sensitive Business Systems,

Post-Incident Analysis

What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?

Incident : cyberattack CHE0802408090925

Root Causes: Underinvestment In Cybersecurity Infrastructure, Lack Of Employee Training On Phishing And Social Engineering, Delayed Patching Of Known Vulnerabilities, Insufficient Network Segmentation,

Incident : Cyberattacks (General) CHE0532105091725

Root Causes: Underfunded Cybersecurity Defenses In Education And Government Sectors., Rapid Digitisation Without Proportional Security Investments., Uneven Global Cyber Resilience Leading To Regional Attack Concentration.,

Corrective Actions: Sector-Specific Cybersecurity Frameworks And Funding Allocations., Mandatory Threat Intelligence Sharing Platforms For High-Risk Industries., Regional Cybersecurity Task Forces To Address Localized Attack Surges.,

Incident : Cloud Security Breach CHE2532625101625

Root Causes: Cybersecurity Alert Fatigue Burying Critical Warnings., Fragmented/Hybrid Environments With Visibility Gaps., Legacy Tools Incompatible With Cloud Scale., Lack Of Logging/Monitoring (E.G., Disabled Aws Cloudtrail)., Overly Permissive Access Controls And Misconfigurations., Multi-Cloud Complexity Leading To Unmanaged Data Dispersal.,

Corrective Actions: Deploy Unified Monitoring With Threat Intelligence Integration., Enforce Zero Trust And Least Privilege Access Across All Cloud Assets., Mandate Logging For All Cloud Services (E.G., Cloudtrail, Azure Monitor)., Conduct Regular Audits And Penetration Tests For Misconfigurations., Tailor Incident Response Plans To Cloud Environments With Clear Roles., Invest In Training And Resources To Address Skill Gaps In Cloud Security.,

What corrective actions has the company taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Corrective Actions Taken: The company has taken the following corrective actions based on post-incident analysis: Sector-Specific Cybersecurity Frameworks And Funding Allocations., Mandatory Threat Intelligence Sharing Platforms For High-Risk Industries., Regional Cybersecurity Task Forces To Address Localized Attack Surges., , Deploy Unified Monitoring With Threat Intelligence Integration., Enforce Zero Trust And Least Privilege Access Across All Cloud Assets., Mandate Logging For All Cloud Services (E.G., Cloudtrail, Azure Monitor)., Conduct Regular Audits And Penetration Tests For Misconfigurations., Tailor Incident Response Plans To Cloud Environments With Clear Roles., Invest In Training And Resources To Address Skill Gaps In Cloud Security., .

Additional Questions

General Information

Who was the attacking group in the last incident ?

Last Attacking Group: The attacking group in the last incident was an CoreInjection.

Incident Details

What was the most recent incident detected ?

Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2025-08-01.

What was the most recent incident publicly disclosed ?

Most Recent Incident Publicly Disclosed: The most recent incident publicly disclosed was on 2025-01-01.

Impact of the Incidents

What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?

Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were user credentials, employee contract details, internal network maps, and .

Response to the Incidents

What containment measures were taken in the most recent incident ?

Containment Measures in Most Recent Incident: The containment measures taken in the most recent incident was Revoking IAM RolesDetaching Compromised Instances from NetworksIsolating Affected Cloud Assets.

Data Breach Information

What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?

Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were user credentials, internal network maps and employee contract details.

Lessons Learned and Recommendations

What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?

Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Incident response plans must be cloud-specific, regularly tested, and include all stakeholders.

What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?

Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Adopt proactive measures like adaptive behavioral WAFs, network segmentation, and enhanced monitoring., Enhance employee training and awareness programs to mitigate human-error risks., Strengthen regulatory compliance and cross-border collaboration to address global cyber threats., Conduct **regular cloud configuration audits** and penetration tests to identify misconfigurations., Develop and test incident response plans specific to ransomware and data breaches., Invest in **employee training** on cloud threats, response tactics, and shared responsibility models., Enhance endpoint detection and response (EDR) capabilities., Implement multi-factor authentication (MFA) across all systems., Enable and configure **logging services** (AWS CloudTrail, Azure Monitor) to avoid blind spots., Collaborate with government and private-sector cybersecurity initiatives (e.g., CISA in the US)., Prioritize patch management to address known vulnerabilities., Conduct regular security audits and penetration testing., Develop and **test cloud-tailored incident response plans**, including tabletop exercises for multi-cloud scenarios., Prioritize **visibility** across hybrid/multi-cloud environments to reduce detection delays., Advocate for **resource allocation** (software, hardware, personnel) to support cloud security preparedness., Implement robust incident response plans and third-party threat intelligence sharing (e.g., Check Point Research)., Implement **unified cloud security tools** (e.g., AWS GuardDuty, Azure Defender) with behavioral analytics., Increase cybersecurity funding and resources for underprotected sectors like education and government., Adopt **zero trust principles**: least privilege access, continuous validation and and network segmentation..

References

What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?

Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are ITPro Article: 'Why cloud breaches are going undetected', Check Point’s 2025 Cloud Security Report, Check Point Research and The Hindu.

Investigation Status

What is the current status of the most recent investigation ?

Current Status of Most Recent Investigation: The current status of the most recent investigation is ongoing (sector-wide trend analysis).

Initial Access Broker

Post-Incident Analysis

What was the most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Root Cause: The most significant root cause identified in post-incident analysis was Underinvestment in cybersecurity infrastructureLack of employee training on phishing and social engineeringDelayed patching of known vulnerabilitiesInsufficient network segmentation, Underfunded cybersecurity defenses in education and government sectors.Rapid digitisation without proportional security investments.Uneven global cyber resilience leading to regional attack concentration., Cybersecurity alert fatigue burying critical warnings.Fragmented/hybrid environments with visibility gaps.Legacy tools incompatible with cloud scale.Lack of logging/monitoring (e.g., disabled AWS CloudTrail).Overly permissive access controls and misconfigurations.Multi-cloud complexity leading to unmanaged data dispersal..

What was the most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis ?

Most Significant Corrective Action: The most significant corrective action taken based on post-incident analysis was Sector-specific cybersecurity frameworks and funding allocations.Mandatory threat intelligence sharing platforms for high-risk industries.Regional cybersecurity task forces to address localized attack surges., Deploy unified monitoring with threat intelligence integration.Enforce zero trust and least privilege access across all cloud assets.Mandate logging for all cloud services (e.g., CloudTrail, Azure Monitor).Conduct regular audits and penetration tests for misconfigurations.Tailor incident response plans to cloud environments with clear roles.Invest in training and resources to address skill gaps in cloud security..

cve

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

A vulnerability has been found in SeaCMS up to 13.3. The affected element is an unknown function of the file js/player/dmplayer/dmku/class/mysqli.class.php. Such manipulation of the argument page/limit leads to sql injection. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
cvss3
Base: 7.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
cvss4
Base: 6.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Stored XSS.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Tormorten WP Microdata allows Stored XSS.This issue affects WP Microdata: from n/a through 1.0.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
Description

Exposure of Sensitive System Information to an Unauthorized Control Sphere vulnerability in HappyDevs TempTool allows Retrieve Embedded Sensitive Data.This issue affects TempTool: from n/a through 1.3.1.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

A vulnerability has been found in Tenda FH1201 1.2.0.14(408). Affected is the function sprintf of the file /goform/SetIpBind. Such manipulation of the argument page leads to stack-based buffer overflow. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit has been disclosed to the public and may be used.

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 9.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
cvss3
Base: 8.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 7.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X

Access Data Using Our API

SubsidiaryImage

Get company history

curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=check-point-software-technologies' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'

What Do We Measure ?

revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Incident
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Finding
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Grade
revertimgrevertimgrevertimgrevertimg
Digital Assets

Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.

These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:

Network Security

Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.

SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)

Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.

CMDB (Configuration Management Database)

Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.

Threat Intelligence

Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.

Top LeftTop RightBottom LeftBottom Right
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
Users Love Us Badge