Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Chatham Capital Group, Inc.Chatham Capital Group, Inc.
VS
State StreetState Street
Chatham Capital Group, Inc.

Chatham Capital Group, Inc.

6602 Abercorn Street, Savannah, 31405, US

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
724/1000Moderate

After three decades of managing portfolios for institutional clients, the founders established Chatham in 1996 to provide professional, unbiased wealth management advice to individuals, families and their related foundations, as well as to manage their own financial aff...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:10
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
2
Attack type number
1
State Street

State Street

One Lincoln St, Boston, 02111, US

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.statestreet.com
807/1000Good

At State Street, we deliver leading investment platforms, data, expertise, and solutions that accelerate performance and better decision making. With over 200 years of global financial leadership, we equip institutional investors through a comprehensive suite of capabil...

NAICS:52
NAICS Definition:Finance and Insurance
Employees:45,731
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Chatham Capital Group, Inc.

Chatham Capital Group, Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
State Street

State Street

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chatham Capital Group, Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Financial Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for State Street in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Chatham Capital Group, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chatham Capital Group, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - State Street (X = Date, Y = Severity)

State Street cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Chatham Capital Group, Inc.

Chatham Capital Group, Inc.

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA439090725
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHAPOSTHERR-1769110042
State Street

State Street

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. company and State Street company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. and State Street, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. and State Street, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Chatham Capital Group, Inc. or State Street ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Chatham Capital Group, Inc. or State Street ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. and State Street, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Chatham Capital Group, Inc. and State Street, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-63261
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). A low-privileged authenticated user can send a specially crafted request to a Kibana machine learning feature, causing the server to exhaust available memory and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63260
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Resource Consumption (CWE-400) in Kibana can lead to denial of service via Excessive Allocation (CAPEC-130). An authenticated attacker with low-privilege access can trigger a denial of service condition in Kibana by sending a specially crafted, oversized request payload. Processing this user-supplied input requires resource-intensive memory allocation that can exhaust the available heap memory in the Kibana process, causing it to crash and become unavailable to all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63259
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key (CWE-639) in Kibana can lead to information disclosure via user-supplied identifiers that reference scheduled query result data from Kibana Spaces the requester is not authorized to access.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63145
SUMMARY

Incorrect Authorization (CWE-863) in Kibana can lead to integrity compromise of Machine Learning audit and notification records via Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs (CAPEC-1). A vulnerability exists in Kibana's Machine Learning functionality where a Machine Learning management endpoint performs an insufficient authorization check. The endpoint validates only a coarse privilege level but does not verify that the requesting user has access to the specific Machine Learning job or notification resources provided in the request. As a result, a low-privileged user with Machine Learning access in any Kibana space can manipulate Machine Learning audit and notification records for arbitrary jobs—including jobs in other spaces or belonging to other users—by leveraging Kibana's internally elevated credentials to write to restricted Machine Learning system indices that the user cannot access directly.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-63144
SUMMARY

Uncontrolled Recursion (CWE-674) in Elasticsearch can lead to denial of service via a specially crafted search request submitted by a low-privileged authenticated user. A user with read-level index access can submit a request that triggers unbounded recursive processing within the Elasticsearch query evaluation component, causing a fatal error that terminates the affected node. In single-node deployments, this results in complete service outage; in multi-node clusters, it causes repeated node restarts and sustained availability degradation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-21
UPDATED
Date2026-07-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8