Comparison Overview
Chase Corporation

Chase Corporation
375 University Ave, Westwood, Massachusetts, 02090, US
Last Update: 01/03/2026
We are a leading manufacturer of protective materials for high reliability applications. For over 70 years we have made a material difference by developing high performance Industrial Coatings, Tapes, Adhesives and Sealants that are marketed under brand names recogniz...

Dow
2211 H.H. Dow Way, Midland, 48674, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Dow (NYSE: DOW) is one of the world’s leading materials science companies, serving customers in high-growth markets such as packaging, infrastructure, mobility and consumer applications. Our global breadth, asset integration and scale, customer-focused innovation and le...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Chase Corporation







Dow






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Chase Corporation in 2026.
Incidents vs Chemical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dow in 2026.
Incident History - Chase Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Chase Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dow (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dow cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Chase Corporation

Dow
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.