Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Charlotte RadiologyCharlotte Radiology
VS
Johnson & Johnson MedTechJohnson & Johnson MedTech
Charlotte Radiology

Charlotte Radiology

700 E Morehead St, Charlotte, 28202, US

Last Update: 03/04/2026

View Profile
735/1000Moderate

Established in 1967, Charlotte Radiology is one of the largest and most progressive radiology groups in the country. Known locally to be the imaging experts, we own and operate 18 breast centers, a mobile breast center program, a vein center and several vascular and int...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:359
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

1 Johnson and Johnson Plaza, New Brunswick, New Jersey, US, 08901

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
811/1000Good

At Johnson & Johnson MedTech, we are working to solve the world’s most pressing healthcare challenges through innovations at the intersection of biology and technology. With deep expertise in surgery, orthopaedics, cardiovascular, and vision, we design healthcare soluti...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,750
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Charlotte Radiology

Charlotte Radiology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte Radiology in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Johnson & Johnson MedTech in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Charlotte Radiology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte Radiology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Johnson & Johnson MedTech (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Johnson & Johnson MedTech cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Charlotte Radiology

Charlotte Radiology

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA1456522
Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Johnson & Johnson MedTech

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Charlotte Radiology company and Johnson & Johnson MedTech company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Charlotte Radiology and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Charlotte Radiology and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Charlotte Radiology or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Charlotte Radiology or Johnson & Johnson MedTech ?
Between Charlotte Radiology and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Charlotte Radiology and Johnson & Johnson MedTech, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-8325
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted PDF file, when parsed through Autodesk Revit, can force an Out-of-Bounds Write vulnerability. A malicious actor may leverage this vulnerability to cause a crash, cause data corruption, or execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7867
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in udisks2. A local attacker with an active console session can exploit insufficient authorization checking on the 'as-user' option in the org.freedesktop.UDisks2.Filesystem.Mount() D-Bus method. This allows the attacker to spoof the 'as-user' parameter, mounting filesystems on behalf of arbitrary users, including privileged accounts. This can lead to local privilege escalation through mount point injection and manipulation of the mount namespace visible to privileged users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7406
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted BMP file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products, can force a Untrusted Pointer Dereference vulnerability. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code in the context of the current process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-7405
SUMMARY

A maliciously crafted TIF file, when parsed through certain Autodesk products during image import, can cause an Out-of-Bounds Read in the image handling library. A malicious actor can leverage this vulnerability to cause a denial of service

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-71555
SUMMARY

PILOS (Platform for Interactive Live-Online Seminars) is a frontend for BigBlueButton. From 2.1.0 until 4.14.1, PILOS does not send a Cross-Origin-Opener-Policy response header, so pages opened by PILOS via a link that opens a new browsing context (e.g., target="_blank") retain a window.opener reference back to the originating PILOS tab. A malicious destination page reached this way can use window.opener to navigate or manipulate the original PILOS tab, a technique known as reverse tabnabbing, potentially redirecting an authenticated user to a phishing page that mimics PILOS. This issue is fixed in version 4.14.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-06
UPDATED
Date2026-08-06
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3