Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

ChapelleChapelle
VS
Acosta GroupAcosta Group
Chapelle

Chapelle

Rue de Stassart 35, Ixelles, Brussels Region, 1050, BE

Last Update: 01/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.bdo.be
748/1000Moderate

Who We Are We are a team of experienced and passionate risk specialists, dedicated to providing our clients and community with the best advisory and training services in operational risk and enterprise risk management. We strive to simplify risk management, focusing o...

NAICS:541
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:8
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Acosta Group

Acosta Group

6600 Corporate Center Pkwy, Jacksonville, 32216, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.acosta.group/
774/1000Fair

Acosta Group fuses storied expertise, unmatched connectivity and advanced insight to accelerate brand growth – everywhere you sell. Our collective of the most trusted retail, marketing and foodservice agencies is reimagining how people connect with brands at every point...

NAICS:5416
NAICS Definition:Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services
Employees:38,367
Subsidiaries:26
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Chapelle

Chapelle

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Acosta Group

Acosta Group

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chapelle in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Business Consulting and Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Acosta Group in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Chapelle (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chapelle cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Acosta Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Acosta Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Chapelle

Chapelle

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Acosta Group

Acosta Group

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Chapelle company and Acosta Group company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Chapelle and Acosta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Chapelle and Acosta Group, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Chapelle or Acosta Group ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Chapelle or Acosta Group ?
Between Chapelle and Acosta Group, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Chapelle and Acosta Group, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67978
SUMMARY

An issue in the SBN UDP interface of NASA cFS v7.0.1 allows attackers to cause a Denial of Service (DoS) via transmitting a crafted SBN frame.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67673
SUMMARY

A stack-based buffer overflow vulnerability exists in the cmd_edl function of OreSat Firmware v1.0. The vulnerability is triggered when processing the edl fw_flash command, where the <filename> argument is copied to a 64-byte stack buffer via memcpy without proper length validation. An attacker with physical access to the UART3 serial interface can exploit this vulnerability by sending a maliciously crafted command with an oversized filename parameter,

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-48399
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Violation of Secure Design Principles vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized read access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48333
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated privileges. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-48331
SUMMARY

Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-03
UPDATED
Date2026-08-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9