Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City SchoolsChapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools
VS
Charlotte-Mecklenburg SchoolsCharlotte-Mecklenburg Schools
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools

750 S. Merritt Mill Road, Chapel Hill, 27516, US

Last Update: 28/03/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.chccs.org
760/1000Fair

Established in 1909, CHCCS serves more than 12,000 students on 20 campuses spread across two towns in NC's "Triangle" region. Visit us at www.chccs.org. Comments signed "AJ" are from CHCCS Chief Communications Officer Andy Jenks

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:1,221
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

600 East Fourth Street, Fifth Floor, Charlotte, North Carolina, US, 28202

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cmsk12.org/
783/1000Fair

The mission of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is to create an innovative, inclusive, student-centered environment that supports the development of independent learners. The vision of Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools is to lead the community in educational excellence, inspi...

NAICS:6111
NAICS Definition:Elementary and Secondary Schools
Employees:15,606
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Primary and Secondary Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools

Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA1769570698
Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CHA133120422

FAQ

Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools company and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools or Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools or Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Chapel Hill-Carrboro City Schools and Charlotte-Mecklenburg Schools, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-19374
SUMMARY

A security vulnerability has been detected in adafap api-mcp up to 92b9a5d04acfec165c7d4ef852496593aa87be06. This affects the function customAxios of the file app/api/proxy/route.ts of the component Proxy API Endpoint. The manipulation of the argument url leads to server-side request forgery. The attack is possible to be carried out remotely. This product adopts a rolling release strategy to maintain continuous delivery. Therefore, version details for affected or updated releases cannot be specified. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19373
SUMMARY

A weakness has been identified in PhialsBasement KoboldCPP-MCP-Server 1.0.0. Affected by this issue is the function makeRequest of the file src/index.ts of the component BaseConfigSchema. Executing a manipulation of the argument apiUrl can lead to server-side request forgery. It is possible to launch the attack on the local host. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19372
SUMMARY

A security flaw has been discovered in Handwriting-OCR handwriting-ocr-mcp-server 0.1.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function fs.readFileSync of the file src/index.ts of the component upload_document. Performing a manipulation of the argument File results in path traversal. Attacking locally is a requirement. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-19371
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was identified in Nikolaibibo claude-comfyui-mcp 1.0.0. Affected is the function copyFileSync of the file src/tools/utils.ts of the component comfy_upload_image. Such manipulation of the argument image_path leads to path traversal. An attack has to be approached locally. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:P/I:P/A:P
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 1.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:L/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-12372
SUMMARY

A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in nltk/nltk versions 3.9.4 and the current develop branch. The `nltk.pathsec.validate_network_url()` function, intended to prevent SSRF by rejecting internal network addresses, fails to reject IPs in the RFC 6598 shared address space (`100.64.0.0/10`). This occurs because Python's `ipaddress` module does not classify such addresses as `is_private` or `is_global`, and the current guard only checks `is_private` and a few explicit categories. An attacker who can influence a URL passed to NLTK's network-loading helpers can exploit this vulnerability to make a strict-mode application send requests to shared-address-space hosts, potentially exposing non-public infrastructure reachable from the application host. The impact is limited to SSRF-style confidentiality exposure, with no code execution claimed.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-09
UPDATED
Date2026-08-09
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.7
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.0/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2