Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CERN openlabCERN openlab
VS
The University of EdinburghThe University of Edinburgh
CERN openlab

CERN openlab

Esplanade des Particules, Geneva, 1211, CH

Last Update: 25/02/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://openlab.cern/
755/1000Fair

Established in 2001, CERN openlab is a ground-breaking public-private partnership. Forging collaborations between leading ICT companies and research centres worldwide, uniting them with the forefront of scientific innovation at CERN. These partnerships fuel CERN resear...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh

Old College, South Bridge, Edinburgh, GB, EH8 9YL

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://edin.ac/liprofile
785/1000Fair

Imagine what you could do at a world-leading university that is globally recognised for its teaching, research and innovation. The University of Edinburgh has been providing students with world-class teaching for more than 425 years, unlocking the potential of some o...

NAICS:5417
NAICS Definition:Scientific Research and Development Services
Employees:15,886
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CERN openlab

CERN openlab

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CERN openlab in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Services Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Edinburgh in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CERN openlab (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CERN openlab cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Edinburgh (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Edinburgh cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CERN openlab

CERN openlab

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The University of Edinburgh

The University of Edinburgh

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CERN openlab company and The University of Edinburgh company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CERN openlab and The University of Edinburgh, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CERN openlab and The University of Edinburgh, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CERN openlab or The University of Edinburgh ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CERN openlab or The University of Edinburgh ?
Between CERN openlab and The University of Edinburgh, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CERN openlab and The University of Edinburgh, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2