Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)
VS
United States Department of WarUnited States Department of War
Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)

Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)

San Antonio , US

Last Update: 08/01/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cmawarrior.org
749/1000Moderate

CMA’s mission is to serve actively transitioning military service members by providing vetted resources and military-to-civilian cross-trained expertise which is focused on supporting and preparing the military community for professional career opportunities while provi...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:24
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

Washington, DC, US

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://war.gov
812/1000Good

The mission of the Department of War is to provide military forces necessary to protect the security of our country. The U.S. military defends the homeland, deters adversaries, and builds security around the world by projecting U.S. influence and working with allies and...

NAICS:92811
NAICS Definition:National Security
Employees:67,477
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)

Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Armed Forces Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for United States Department of War in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - United States Department of War (X = Date, Y = Severity)

United States Department of War cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)

Centurion Military Alliance (CMA)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
United States Department of War

United States Department of War

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) company and United States Department of War company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) and United States Department of War, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) and United States Department of War, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) or United States Department of War ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) or United States Department of War ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) and United States Department of War, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centurion Military Alliance (CMA) and United States Department of War, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2