Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centro Paula SouzaCentro Paula Souza
VS
US Government Accountability OfficeUS Government Accountability Office
Centro Paula Souza

Centro Paula Souza

Rua dos Andradas, 140, São Paulo, SP, 01208-000, BR

Last Update: 19/02/2026

View Profile

Autarquia do Governo do Estado de São Paulo vinculada à Secretaria de Ciência, Tecnologia e Inovação, o Centro Paula Souza (CPS) administra as Faculdades de Tecnologia (Fatecs) e as Escolas Técnicas (Etecs) estaduais, além das classes descentralizadas – unidades que fun...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:6,128
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

441 G Street, N.W., Washington, 20548, US

Last Update: 28/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.gao.gov
674/1000Weak

For more information about GAO, please visit www.gao.gov. General Information The U.S. Government Accountability Office (GAO) is an independent, nonpartisan agency that works for Congress. Often called the "congressional watchdog,"​ GAO investigates how the federal go...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:17,303
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centro Paula Souza

Centro Paula Souza

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centro Paula Souza in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

US Government Accountability Office has 98.02% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Centro Paula Souza (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centro Paula Souza cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - US Government Accountability Office (X = Date, Y = Severity)

US Government Accountability Office cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centro Paula Souza

Centro Paula Souza

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
US Government Accountability Office

US Government Accountability Office

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1790619948
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
US-1773483893
🔒 Incident : Breach
US-FOR1772821514

FAQ

Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centro Paula Souza company and US Government Accountability Office company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centro Paula Souza and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centro Paula Souza and US Government Accountability Office, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centro Paula Souza or US Government Accountability Office ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centro Paula Souza or US Government Accountability Office ?
Between Centro Paula Souza and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centro Paula Souza and US Government Accountability Office, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3