Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centre for Technology InfusionCentre for Technology Infusion
VS
ProsusProsus
Centre for Technology Infusion

Centre for Technology Infusion

La Trobe University, Bundoora, 3083, AU

Last Update: 27/02/2026

View Profile
767/1000Fair

The Centre for Technology Infusion (CTI) collaborates with local and international partners to research, develop and test next generation technology solutions and solve problems affecting a wide range of industries today. Our Centre is a one-stop-shop for our partners ...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Prosus

Prosus

Gustav Mahlerplein 5, Amsterdam, North Holland, NL, 1082MS

Last Update: 06/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://prosus.com
788/1000Fair

Prosus is the power behind the world’s leading lifestyle e-commerce brands. Bringing together bold ideas and the power of AI, Prosus builds technology ecosystems where lifestyle ecommerce brands can become global success stories. These ecosystems span three core geogra...

NAICS:513
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,342
Subsidiaries:19
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centre for Technology Infusion

Centre for Technology Infusion

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Prosus

Prosus

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Centre for Technology Infusion in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Technology, Information and Internet Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prosus in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Centre for Technology Infusion (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centre for Technology Infusion cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Prosus (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prosus cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centre for Technology Infusion

Centre for Technology Infusion

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Prosus

Prosus

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion company and Prosus company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion and Prosus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion and Prosus, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centre for Technology Infusion or Prosus ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centre for Technology Infusion or Prosus ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion and Prosus, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centre for Technology Infusion and Prosus, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2