Comparison Overview

International Centre for Life

VS

Sealcentre Pieterburen

International Centre for Life

International Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, NE1 4EP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.life.org.uk

The International Centre for Life (or ‘Life’ as we’re known) was founded in 2000, a pioneering science village in the heart of Newcastle upon Tyne. We are proudly independent, entrepreneurial and quirky – and we are always interested in hearing from people with the talent, drive and skills to help us continue to make a difference. Our purpose is to inspire everyone to explore and enjoy science, and to provide a world-class science hub where life enhancing engagement, research and patient treatment can thrive. Life Science Centre, which opened in May 2000, is the science centre for the North, with the North’s biggest Planetarium, too. Our varied and exciting engagement programme serves families, schools, adults, pre-schoolers and teenagers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Sealcentre Pieterburen

Hoofdstraat 94A, Pieterburen, Groningen, 9968 AG, NL
Last Update: 2026-01-23
Between 750 and 799
http://www.zeehondencentrum.nl

Sealcentre Pieterburen is a science-based hospital and research centre for mainly Harbour and Grey seals. We believe in healthy seals, as bio-indicators for a healthy sea. We work as a learning community, in which volunteers, student, visitors, partners and the general public are all involved. Together we strive for a clean environment for the seals and humans alike and we have the privilege to do this right next to the UNESCO World Heritage site: the Wadden Sea. You can get involved with our work in various ways: Become a volunteer or do an internship – https://www.zeehondencentrum.nl/volunteering Follow us here and on other social media - https://www.zeehondencentrum.nl/contact

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 38
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-life.jpeg
International Centre for Life
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seal-rehabilitation-and-research-centre.jpeg
Sealcentre Pieterburen
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Centre for Life
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Sealcentre Pieterburen
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Centre for Life in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sealcentre Pieterburen in 2026.

Incident History — International Centre for Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Centre for Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Sealcentre Pieterburen (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sealcentre Pieterburen cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-life.jpeg
International Centre for Life
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/seal-rehabilitation-and-research-centre.jpeg
Sealcentre Pieterburen
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

International Centre for Life company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Sealcentre Pieterburen company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Sealcentre Pieterburen company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Centre for Life company.

In the current year, Sealcentre Pieterburen company and International Centre for Life company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Sealcentre Pieterburen company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Sealcentre Pieterburen company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Sealcentre Pieterburen company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Centre for Life company nor Sealcentre Pieterburen company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

International Centre for Life company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Sealcentre Pieterburen company.

International Centre for Life company employs more people globally than Sealcentre Pieterburen company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Sealcentre Pieterburen holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References