Comparison Overview

International Centre for Life

VS

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)

International Centre for Life

International Centre for Life, Newcastle upon Tyne, Tyne & Wear, NE1 4EP, GB
Last Update: 2026-01-22
View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.life.org.uk

The International Centre for Life (or ‘Life’ as we’re known) was founded in 2000, a pioneering science village in the heart of Newcastle upon Tyne. We are proudly independent, entrepreneurial and quirky – and we are always interested in hearing from people with the talent, drive and skills to help us continue to make a difference. Our purpose is to inspire everyone to explore and enjoy science, and to provide a world-class science hub where life enhancing engagement, research and patient treatment can thrive. Life Science Centre, which opened in May 2000, is the science centre for the North, with the North’s biggest Planetarium, too. Our varied and exciting engagement programme serves families, schools, adults, pre-schoolers and teenagers.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 74
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
View Profile

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)

2626 West Broad Street, Richmond, Virginia, 23220, US
Last Update: 2026-01-21
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cmorva.org

The Children's Museum of Richmond is a nonprofit organization with the mission to inspire growth in all children by engaging families in learning through play. Our Values: We value learning. •Children: We have respect for all children and their amazing abilities. We are passionate about the process of learning and the importance of play. We want to inspire creativity, curiosity and exploration. •Staff: We surround ourselves with trustworthy people who thrive on a team and share our energy, passion, creativity, and optimism. We learn by listening to children, families, teachers and others who support them. •Community: We seek partnerships and collaborations that benefit young children. We celebrate our community’s diversity and offer a safe place for all children to interact, play and learn.

NAICS: 712
NAICS Definition:
Employees: 52
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-life.jpeg
International Centre for Life
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-richmond.jpeg
Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)
—
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
—
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
—
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
—
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
—
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
International Centre for Life
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for International Centre for Life in 2026.

Incidents vs Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) in 2026.

Incident History — International Centre for Life (X = Date, Y = Severity)

International Centre for Life cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/centre-for-life.jpeg
International Centre for Life
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/children's-museum-of-richmond.jpeg
Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR)
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Both International Centre for Life company and Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company demonstrate a comparable AI Cybersecurity Score, with strong governance and monitoring frameworks in place.

Historically, Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to International Centre for Life company.

In the current year, Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company and International Centre for Life company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company nor International Centre for Life company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither International Centre for Life company nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

International Centre for Life company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company.

International Centre for Life company employs more people globally than Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) company, reflecting its scale as a Museums, Historical Sites, and Zoos.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds HIPAA certification.

Neither International Centre for Life nor Children's Museum of Richmond (CMoR) holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Improper validation of specified type of input in M365 Copilot allows an unauthorized attacker to disclose information over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
References
Description

Improper access control in Azure Front Door (AFD) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.8
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
References
Description

Azure Entra ID Elevation of Privilege Vulnerability

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:L/A:N
References
Description

Moonraker is a Python web server providing API access to Klipper 3D printing firmware. In versions 0.9.3 and below, instances configured with the "ldap" component enabled are vulnerable to LDAP search filter injection techniques via the login endpoint. The 401 error response message can be used to determine whether or not a search was successful, allowing for brute force methods to discover LDAP entries on the server such as user IDs and user attributes. This issue has been fixed in version 0.10.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 2.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:U/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
Description

Runtipi is a Docker-based, personal homeserver orchestrator that facilitates multiple services on a single server. Versions 3.7.0 and above allow an authenticated user to execute arbitrary system commands on the host server by injecting shell metacharacters into backup filenames. The BackupManager fails to sanitize the filenames of uploaded backups. The system persists user-uploaded files directly to the host filesystem using the raw originalname provided in the request. This allows an attacker to stage a file containing shell metacharacters (e.g., $(id).tar.gz) at a predictable path, which is later referenced during the restore process. The successful storage of the file is what allows the subsequent restore command to reference and execute it. This issue has been fixed in version 4.7.0.

Published
Date
2026-01-22
Updated
Date
2026-01-22
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.0
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
References