Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.
VS
COLASCOLAS
Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.

Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.

631 Pecan Circle, Manhattan, 66502, US

Last Update: 03/02/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

As one of the Midwest's premier full-service mechanical contractors, Central Mechanical Construction Co., Inc. (CMCC) offers professional HVAC, plumbing, piping, ductwork, and utilities services. With decades of experience working in the commercial, government, institut...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:58
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
COLAS

COLAS

1, Rue du Colonel Pierre Avia, Paris, 75015, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://allinks.click/colas
841/1000Good

Colas, a subsidiary of the Bouygues Group, is a major player in the construction and maintenance of transportation infrastructure and urban development. Colas covers the entire value chain: from industrial production to service offerings, including construction work. ...

NAICS:23
NAICS Definition:Construction
Employees:16,508
Subsidiaries:119
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.

Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
COLAS

COLAS

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Construction Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for COLAS in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - COLAS (X = Date, Y = Severity)

COLAS cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.

Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc.

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
COLAS

COLAS

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. company and COLAS company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. and COLAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. and COLAS, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. or COLAS ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. or COLAS ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. and COLAS, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Central Mechanical Construction Co. Inc. and COLAS, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-67866
SUMMARY

Buffer Overflow vulnerability in Systerel S2OPC 1.7.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the LockedStaMac_ProcessMsg_DeleteMonitoredItemsResponse and SOPC_StaMac_NewDeleteMonitoredItems in the client wrapper DeleteMonitoredItems path

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-67863
SUMMARY

In open62541 1.5.5, a server-side use-after-free exists in the local MonitoredItem callback path. The issue occurs when UA_Subscription_localPublish continues to use the current UA_Notification after a callback invokes UA_Server_deleteMonitoredItem for the current local MonitoredItem. This allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-19026
SUMMARY

H5Z__filter_nbit in H5Znbit.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 dereferences cd_values[0] through cd_values[4] without validating that cd_values is non-NULL or that cd_nelmts is at least 5, the fixed size of the filter's header. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service via a crafted HDF5 file that stores the N-Bit filter pipeline message with zero client-data values, opened and read via H5Dread, e.g. by the h5ls or h5repack tools.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-19025
SUMMARY

H5O__layout_decode in H5Olayout.c in HDF5 through 2.3.0 does not validate that a chunked dataset's stored chunk-layout dimensionality matches its dataspace rank when an existing dataset is opened, whereas this check is performed only at dataset-creation time. This allows attackers to cause a denial of service (divide-by-zero and application crash in H5S__hyper_iter_get_seq_list in src/H5Shyper.c) via a crafted HDF5 file with mismatched chunk/dataspace ranks that is opened and read via H5Dopen2 and H5Dread, e.g. by the h5repack tool.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-05
UPDATED
Date2026-08-05
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA