Comparison Overview
Central Marketing Group (CMG)

Central Marketing Group (CMG)
Thanon Rama IV, Khlong Toei District, Bangkok City, 10110, TH
Last Update: 27/10/2025
Central Marketing Group (CMG), under Central Retail, is a leading retail brand distributor and operator in Thailand. Our brand portfolio includes over 30 well-known international brands, from fashion, beauty, and watches to home & lifestyle products. CMG is the exclusiv...

Dillard's
1600 Cantrell Rd., Little Rock, 72201, US
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Dillard's, Inc. ranks among the nation's largest fashion apparel and home furnishings retailers with annual revenues exceeding $6.1 billion. The Company focuses on delivering maximum fashion and value to its shoppers by offering compelling apparel and home selections co...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Central Marketing Group (CMG)







Dillard's






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Central Marketing Group (CMG) in 2026.
Incidents vs Retail Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Dillard's in 2026.
Incident History - Central Marketing Group (CMG) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Central Marketing Group (CMG) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Dillard's (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Dillard's cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Central Marketing Group (CMG)

Dillard's
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.