Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Central Engineering Consultancy BureauCentral Engineering Consultancy Bureau
VS
EpirocEpiroc
Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau

Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau

NO- 415 ,, Colombo - 7, Western 00700, LK

Last Update: 02/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.cecb.lk/
760/1000Fair

The CECB - Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau. The foremost Engineering consultancy services provider in Sri Lanka today : Multi-Disciplinary in Function, Futuristic in approach and, above all, Gifted with a team of Inspired Professionals yearning to go beyond. T...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:648
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Epiroc

Epiroc

Sickla Industriväg 19, Nacka, Stockholm, SE, 131 54

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.epiroc.com
804/1000Good

Performance to succeed today. Technology to lead tomorrow. Epiroc is your partner for mining and infrastructure equipment. We're excited to build on proven expertise and performance with the same people and a bold new drive to make what's good even better. Just lik...

NAICS:237
NAICS Definition:Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction
Employees:12,558
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau

Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Epiroc

Epiroc

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Epiroc in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Epiroc (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Epiroc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau

Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Epiroc

Epiroc

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau company and Epiroc company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau and Epiroc, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau or Epiroc ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau or Epiroc ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau and Epiroc, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Central Engineering Consultancy Bureau and Epiroc, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA