Comparison Overview
Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc
Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc
317 Jake Alexander Blvd S, Salisbury, US
Last Update: 02/04/2026
Central Carolina Insurance Agency is an independent insurance firm that began operations in Rowan County in 1931, and the organization grew in the 1980s with an expansion into Mooresville. In 2017 we added R3; Risk, Reduction Resources to our firm to diversify Central ...
Progressive Insurance
300 North Commons Blvd, Mayfield Village, 44143, US
Last Update: 04/04/2026
Every journey has a beginning, and wherever you are on your career path, we want to help you along the way. At Progressive, we exist to help people move forward and live fully. We strive to create a welcoming and flexible work environment for everyone, where employees ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc
Progressive Insurance
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc in 2026.
Incidents vs Insurance Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Progressive Insurance in 2026.
Incident History - Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Progressive Insurance (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Progressive Insurance cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Central Carolina Insurance Agency Inc
Progressive Insurance
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Spinnaker is an open source, multi-cloud continuous delivery platform. Prior to versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4 on their respective release lines, Kustomize bake operations allow unsafe YAML tag processing in rosco manifests. This can lead to remote code execution on rosco pods when performing Kustomize bakes. This issue is fixed in versions 2026.1.1, 2026.0.3, 2025.4.4, and 2025.3.4.
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/2d75818b85cc4c35144d5e5ed45e7340fcab5dfe
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/bbc30c9b9034a056e95f012fa1b34e9fd703cae7
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/de5a7a05af35aee19eb71d289cd0b77f67509009
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/df32d568e82519d9f3896fc9007baba0077c87fd
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/commit/f5cec213f8cf207843ed5a6929395960a1ca094f
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.3.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2025.4.4
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.0.3
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.1.1
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/releases/tag/rosco-2026.2.0
- https://github.com/spinnaker/spinnaker/security/advisories/GHSA-p68j-q7hf-3qcp
Multiple connections to the backend using the same charging station ID are allowed, which could allow an attacker to deploy multiple instances of malicious OCPP clients to overwhelm the backend.
Previously, there was no throttling on repeated authentication attempts to the charging station backend, which could allow an attacker to execute a denial-of-service attack.
The charging station websocket endpoint accepts connections without proper authentication, which could lead to privilege escalation.
vulnerability in Drupal Commerce guest registration allows . This issue affects Commerce guest registration versions: *.*.