Comparison Overview
Centers for Dialysis Care
Centers for Dialysis Care
18720 Chagrin Blvd, Shaker Heights, 44122, US
Last Update: 06/07/2026
Centers for Dialysis Care is an independent, regional provider of dialysis services to individuals with kidney failure. CDC facilities are located throughout Northeast Ohio including the greater metropolitan Cleveland area, Lake, Geauga and Ashtabula counties. Our missi...
Prisma Health
300 E McBee Ave, Greenville, 29601, US
Last Update: 01/04/2026
Prisma Health is the largest not-for-profit health organization in South Carolina, serving more than 1.2 million patients annually. Our facilities in the Greenville and Columbia surrounding markets are dedicated to improving the health of all South Carolinians through i...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Centers for Dialysis Care
Prisma Health
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
Centers for Dialysis Care has 28.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Prisma Health in 2026.
Incident History - Centers for Dialysis Care (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Centers for Dialysis Care cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Prisma Health (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Prisma Health cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Centers for Dialysis Care
Prisma Health
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.
Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.