Comparison Overview
Centerra Group
Centerra Group
13530 Dulles Technology Dr, Herndon, Virginia, 20171, US
Last Update: 13/01/2026
Centerra is a Constellis company. Please follow Constellis' LinkedIn page for news and information regarding any of its brands. Constellis is a leading provider of risk management and operational support services to government and commercial clients worldwide. Cons...
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
9 Campus Drive, Parsippany, 07054, US
Last Update: 21/09/2026
Securitas knows Security. It is our only business. As The Leader in Protective Services, we invest in people, knowledge and technology to deliver customized, cost-effective and class-leading solutions. Our parent company, Securitas AB, is a global company headquartered ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Centerra Group
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Centerra Group in 2026.
Incidents vs Security and Investigations Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. in 2026.
Incident History - Centerra Group (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Centerra Group cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc. cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Centerra Group
Securitas Security Services USA, Inc.
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to exposure of session tokens in the HTML response.
IBM TRIRIGA Application Platform 5.0.0 through 5.0.8 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information due to an XML external entity (XXE) injection flaw.
IBM Aspera Enterprise WebApps 1.0.0 through 1.0.6 could allow a local attacker to obtain sensitive information due to cleartext transmission of sensitive information.
IBM Planning Analytics 2.0, and 2.1 could allow a remote authenticated attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
IBM DataStage on Cloud Pak for Data 5.4.0.0 can allow a man-in-the-middle attacker to present a forged TLS certificate, intercept the connection, and capture the IAM bearer Authorization header automatically attached by the session adapter. The captured token grants full platform-scope tenant API access, enabling the attacker to read and manipulate the victim's DataStage projects, flows, assets, and pipeline definitions. This is client-side SDK code running on the user's own machine, so exploitation requires an external network interceptor rather than a co-tenant in the shared cluster.