Comparison Overview
CenterPoint Energy

CenterPoint Energy
1111 Louisiana St, Houston, 77002, US
Last Update: 16/09/2026
CenterPoint Energy, Inc. (NYSE: CNP) is a multi-state electric and natural gas delivery company serving approximately 7 million metered customers across Indiana, Minnesota, Ohio, and Texas. The company is headquartered in Houston and is the only Texas-domiciled investor...

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
Maxwell Drive, Sunninghill , Johannesburg, 2191, ZA
Last Update: 11/09/2026
Company profile Eskom Holdings generates, transports and distributes approximately 95% of South Africa’s electricity – making up 60% of the total electricity consumed on the African continent. Eskom is the world’s eleventh-largest power utility in terms of generating...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

CenterPoint Energy







Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
CenterPoint Energy has 63.93% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd in 2026.
Incident History - CenterPoint Energy (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CenterPoint Energy cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

CenterPoint Energy

Eskom Holdings SOC Ltd
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
HTTP/2 servers could end up crashing due to inadvertently modifying its HPACK encoder concurrently. This happens because the server modifies the HPACK encoder from two goroutines without synchronization: one uses the encoder to encode a HEADERS frame as part of a response sent to a client and the other modifies the encoder's table size when handling a SETTINGS frame containing SETTINGS_HEADER_TABLE_SIZE that a client sends. A malicious client can repeatedly send a request while changing the header table size to crash the server.
Multiple ECH outer extension references are not permitted under RFC 9849; previously, a client could send a well-crafted packet that could trigger memory exhaustion in the server process by specifying multiple references. We now reject these as malformed and curb the memory amplification vector as a result.
A trusted template author may have previously written a valid template wherein the use of the 'yield' keyword would not be correctly escaped. We now ensure that valid keyword uses are escaped and non-keyword uses are not escaped.
Improper certificate validation in Microsoft Partner Center allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Authorization bypass through user-controlled key in Microsoft Bookings allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.