Comparison Overview
Center for Technical Advancement (CTA)

Center for Technical Advancement (CTA)
1801 Alexander Bell Dr, Reston, Virginia, US, 20191
Last Update: 21/01/2026
The Center for Technical Advancement (CTA) drives innovation and advances technical knowledge in civil engineering by fostering new collaboration between established and emergent technical disciplines within and beyond ASCE. CTA is made up of 9 different Divisions and ...

Mott MacDonald
10 Fleet Place, London, EC4M 7, GB
Last Update: 02/04/2026
We are an engineering, management and development consultancy and one of the largest wholly employee-owned firms of our kind. We plan, design, deliver and maintain the transport, energy, water, defence and security, and buildings infrastructure that is integral to peo...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Center for Technical Advancement (CTA)







Mott MacDonald






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Center for Technical Advancement (CTA) in 2026.
Incidents vs Civil Engineering Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Mott MacDonald in 2026.
Incident History - Center for Technical Advancement (CTA) (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Center for Technical Advancement (CTA) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Mott MacDonald (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Mott MacDonald cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Center for Technical Advancement (CTA)

Mott MacDonald
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.