CAHE
Company Details
Linkedin ID:
center-for-asian-health-equity
Employees number:
7
Number of followers:
327
NAICS:
92312
Industry Type:
Homepage:
uchicago.edu
IP Addresses:
0
Company ID:
CEN_2112211
Scan Status:
In-progress
Center for Advancing Health Equity Company CyberSecurity Posture
uchicago.edu
The Center for Advancing Health Equity in Rural and Underserved Communities (CAHE-RUC) provides a central location for the comprehensive evaluation of the health issues and diverse healthcare needs of rural and underserved communities. CAHE-RUC is a partnership between the Asian Health Coalition and the Penn State College of Medicine that brings together the assets of a world class research institution and a respected non-profit organization to investigate health disparities that disproportionately affect rural and minority communities throughout the country. The Center takes a multidisciplinary, collaborative approach to addressing gaps in clinical medicine and public health through a comprehensive program for research, health education, training, community engagement, policy, and information dissemination. CAHE-RUC provides an innovative model of partnership that demonstrates how community-level coalitions bring value, community access, and deeper translational impact to academic institutions.
Center for Advancing Health Equity A.I CyberSecurity Scoring
CAHE Risk Score (AI oriented)Between 750 and 799
CAHE
Updated:
- Powered by our proprietary A.I cyber incident model
- Insurance preferes TPRM score to calculate premium
CAHE Global Score (TPRM)XXXX
CAHE
- Instant access to detailed risk factors
- Benchmark vs. industry & size peers
- Vulnerabilities
- Findings
CAHE Company CyberSecurity News & History
Past Incidents
2
Attack Types
1
University of Chicago Medicine Medical Group (via third-party vendor Nationwide Recovery Services)
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack with significant impact with customers data leaks
Description: A data breach at **Nationwide Recovery Services**, a third-party debt collection agency, exposed sensitive information of **38,000 University of Chicago Medicine Medical Group patients**. The compromised data included **names, birthdates, addresses, Social Security numbers, financial records, and medical details**, though University of Chicago Medical Center patients were unaffected. The breach was discovered in **July 2023**, with officials warning affected individuals to monitor credit reports and account statements for fraudulent activity. The incident highlights the healthcare sector’s vulnerability to cyberattacks, particularly those targeting third-party vendors with access to patient data. While no direct ransomware or systemic disruption was reported, the exposure of **highly sensitive personal and financial information** poses significant risks of identity theft, financial fraud, and long-term reputational damage to both the medical group and the vendor.
University of Chicago Medical Center
Breach
Rankiteo Explanation
Attack threatening the organization's existence
Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported that the University of Chicago Medical Center experienced an email security incident allowing unauthorized access to personal information between January 4, 2024, and January 30, 2024, affecting a total of 10,332 individuals. The breach was discovered on March 28, 2024, and social security numbers were among the types of compromised information.
CAHE Company Scoring based on AI Models
Cyber Incidents Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
A.I Risk Score Likelihood 3 - 6 - 9 months
Underwriter Stats for CAHE
Incidents vs Public Health Industry Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Center for Advancing Health Equity in 2025.
Incidents vs All-Companies Average (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Center for Advancing Health Equity in 2025.
Incident Types CAHE vs Public Health Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Center for Advancing Health Equity in 2025.
Incident History — CAHE (X = Date, Y = Severity)
CAHE cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries
CAHE Company Subsidiaries
The Center for Advancing Health Equity in Rural and Underserved Communities (CAHE-RUC) provides a central location for the comprehensive evaluation of the health issues and diverse healthcare needs of rural and underserved communities. CAHE-RUC is a partnership between the Asian Health Coalition and the Penn State College of Medicine that brings together the assets of a world class research institution and a respected non-profit organization to investigate health disparities that disproportionately affect rural and minority communities throughout the country. The Center takes a multidisciplinary, collaborative approach to addressing gaps in clinical medicine and public health through a comprehensive program for research, health education, training, community engagement, policy, and information dissemination. CAHE-RUC provides an innovative model of partnership that demonstrates how community-level coalitions bring value, community access, and deeper translational impact to academic institutions.
Loading...
CAHE Similar Companies
Loading...
.png)
CAHE CyberSecurity News
October 03, 2025 07:00 AM
Gergen Fellows reflect on summer experiences, advancing climate action, health equity, education access
Gergen Fellows fanned across the globe this past summer to learn public leadership on the job, in support of a wide range of policy issues...
September 25, 2025 07:00 AM
UNGA80 Side event: Advancing noncommunicable diseases and mental health equity for refugees and migrants
Migrant and displaced populations experience a disproportionate burden of noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) and mental health conditions.
September 09, 2025 07:00 AM
WHO at the United Nations General Assembly 2025
The World Health Organization and partners will raise global awareness during the 80th United Nations General Assembly (UNGA) on progress to...
September 01, 2025 05:44 AM
EQTY 2025: Progress Under Pressure
EQTY 2025: Progress Under Pressure, brings together visionary leaders, sharing their collective wisdom at a critical moment in health equity to light a path...
August 15, 2025 07:00 AM
Advancing NIH’s Mission Through a Unified Strategy
NIH is moving toward a unified strategy that aligns our priorities and funding approaches to fulfill this commitment.
August 12, 2025 07:00 AM
WHO launches Health Inequality Monitoring Network to catalyse progress towards health equity
In June 2025, the World Health Organization (WHO) established the Health Inequality Monitoring (HIM) Network—a WHO-led initiative committed...
June 27, 2025 03:15 PM
How health equity can drive commercial excellence
Embedding leading health equity principles across operations can help pharma companies address disparities and drive commercial success.
June 27, 2025 07:00 AM
Partners unite to launch WHO Disability Health Equity
WHO has launched the WHO Disability Health Equity Initiative, a landmark global initiative to advance health equity for over 1.3 billion...
March 23, 2025 07:00 AM
Health Care: Cyber Attacks, Worrying Trends and Solutions
Cyber threats against hospitals are surging. What steps are being taken by the health-care sector to address the increasing impacts of cyber attacks?
Frequently Asked Questions
Explore insights on cybersecurity incidents, risk posture, and Rankiteo's assessments.
CAHE CyberSecurity History Information
Official Website of Center for Advancing Health Equity
The official website of Center for Advancing Health Equity is https://asianhealth.uchicago.edu/.
Center for Advancing Health Equity’s AI-Generated Cybersecurity Score
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity’s AI-generated cybersecurity score is 760, reflecting their Fair security posture.
How many security badges does Center for Advancing Health Equity’ have ?
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity currently holds 0 security badges, indicating that no recognized compliance certifications are currently verified for the organization.
Does Center for Advancing Health Equity have SOC 2 Type 1 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity is not certified under SOC 2 Type 1.
Does Center for Advancing Health Equity have SOC 2 Type 2 certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity does not hold a SOC 2 Type 2 certification.
Does Center for Advancing Health Equity comply with GDPR ?
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity is not listed as GDPR compliant.
Does Center for Advancing Health Equity have PCI DSS certification ?
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity does not currently maintain PCI DSS compliance.
Does Center for Advancing Health Equity comply with HIPAA ?
According to Rankiteo, Center for Advancing Health Equity is not compliant with HIPAA regulations.
Does Center for Advancing Health Equity have ISO 27001 certification ?
According to Rankiteo,Center for Advancing Health Equity is not certified under ISO 27001, indicating the absence of a formally recognized information security management framework.
Industry Classification of Center for Advancing Health Equity
Center for Advancing Health Equity operates primarily in the Public Health industry.
Number of Employees at Center for Advancing Health Equity
Center for Advancing Health Equity employs approximately 7 people worldwide.
Subsidiaries Owned by Center for Advancing Health Equity
Center for Advancing Health Equity presently has no subsidiaries across any sectors.
Center for Advancing Health Equity’s LinkedIn Followers
Center for Advancing Health Equity’s official LinkedIn profile has approximately 327 followers.
NAICS Classification of Center for Advancing Health Equity
Center for Advancing Health Equity is classified under the NAICS code 92312, which corresponds to Administration of Public Health Programs.
Center for Advancing Health Equity’s Presence on Crunchbase
No, Center for Advancing Health Equity does not have a profile on Crunchbase.
Center for Advancing Health Equity’s Presence on LinkedIn
Yes, Center for Advancing Health Equity maintains an official LinkedIn profile, which is actively utilized for branding and talent engagement, which can be accessed here: https://www.linkedin.com/company/center-for-asian-health-equity.
Cybersecurity Incidents Involving Center for Advancing Health Equity
As of November 28, 2025, Rankiteo reports that Center for Advancing Health Equity has experienced 2 cybersecurity incidents.
Number of Peer and Competitor Companies
Center for Advancing Health Equity has an estimated 280 peer or competitor companies worldwide.
What types of cybersecurity incidents have occurred at Center for Advancing Health Equity ?
Incident Types: The types of cybersecurity incidents that have occurred include Breach.
How does Center for Advancing Health Equity detect and respond to cybersecurity incidents ?
Detection and Response: The company detects and responds to cybersecurity incidents through an communication strategy with advisory to affected patients to monitor credit reports and account statements..
Incident Details
Can you provide details on each incident ?
Title: Email Security Incident at University of Chicago Medical Center
Description: The Maine Office of the Attorney General reported that the University of Chicago Medical Center experienced an email security incident allowing unauthorized access to personal information between January 4, 2024, and January 30, 2024, affecting a total of 10,332 individuals. The breach was discovered on March 28, 2024, and social security numbers were among the types of compromised information.
Date Detected: 2024-03-28
Type: Data Breach
Attack Vector: Email
Title: Data Breach at Nationwide Recovery Services Affecting University of Chicago Medicine Medical Group Patients
Description: Information from 38,000 University of Chicago Medicine (UCM) Medical Group patients was stolen following a breach of third-party debt collection agency Nationwide Recovery Services in July. Attackers obtained patients' names, birthdates, addresses, Social Security numbers, financial data, and/or medical details. The breach did not affect University of Chicago Medical Center patients. Affected individuals were advised to monitor their credit reports and account statements for potential fraud. This incident highlights the rising cybercrime targeting the healthcare industry.
Type: data breach
Motivation: financial gaindata theft
What are the most common types of attacks the company has faced ?
Common Attack Types: The most common types of attacks the company has faced is Breach.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the impact of each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UNI303072825
Data Compromised: Social security numbers
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Data Compromised: Names, Birthdates, Addresses, Social security numbers, Financial data, Medical details
Brand Reputation Impact: potential reputational damage due to patient data exposure
Identity Theft Risk: high (patients advised to monitor credit reports)
Payment Information Risk: financial data compromised
What types of data are most commonly compromised in incidents ?
Commonly Compromised Data Types: The types of data most commonly compromised in incidents are Social Security Numbers, , Pii (Personally Identifiable Information), Phi (Protected Health Information), Financial Data and .
Which entities were affected by each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UNI303072825
Entity Name: University of Chicago Medical Center
Entity Type: Healthcare
Industry: Healthcare
Location: Chicago, IL
Customers Affected: 10332
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Entity Name: University of Chicago Medicine Medical Group
Entity Type: healthcare provider
Industry: healthcare
Location: Chicago, Illinois, USA
Customers Affected: 38,000 patients
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Entity Name: Nationwide Recovery Services
Entity Type: third-party vendor (debt collection agency)
Industry: financial services
Response to the Incidents
What measures were taken in response to each incident ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Communication Strategy: advisory to affected patients to monitor credit reports and account statements
Data Breach Information
What type of data was compromised in each breach ?
Incident : Data Breach UNI303072825
Type of Data Compromised: Social security numbers
Number of Records Exposed: 10332
Sensitivity of Data: High
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Type of Data Compromised: Pii (personally identifiable information), Phi (protected health information), Financial data
Number of Records Exposed: 38,000
Sensitivity of Data: high (includes SSNs, medical details, financial data)
Regulatory Compliance
Were there any regulatory violations and fines imposed for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Regulations Violated: potential HIPAA violations (if PHI was unsecured),
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What lessons were learned from each incident ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Lessons Learned: Increased vigilance required for third-party vendor security in the healthcare sector due to rising cybercrime targeting hospitals and patient data.
What recommendations were made to prevent future incidents ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Recommendations: Enhance third-party vendor risk assessments and security audits., Implement stricter data protection measures for PII/PHI shared with external partners., Provide credit monitoring services to affected patients., Improve incident response coordination between healthcare providers and third-party vendors.Enhance third-party vendor risk assessments and security audits., Implement stricter data protection measures for PII/PHI shared with external partners., Provide credit monitoring services to affected patients., Improve incident response coordination between healthcare providers and third-party vendors.Enhance third-party vendor risk assessments and security audits., Implement stricter data protection measures for PII/PHI shared with external partners., Provide credit monitoring services to affected patients., Improve incident response coordination between healthcare providers and third-party vendors.Enhance third-party vendor risk assessments and security audits., Implement stricter data protection measures for PII/PHI shared with external partners., Provide credit monitoring services to affected patients., Improve incident response coordination between healthcare providers and third-party vendors.
What are the key lessons learned from past incidents ?
Key Lessons Learned: The key lessons learned from past incidents are Increased vigilance required for third-party vendor security in the healthcare sector due to rising cybercrime targeting hospitals and patient data.
References
Where can I find more information about each incident ?
Incident : Data Breach UNI303072825
Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Source: CBS News Chicago
Where can stakeholders find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices ?
Additional Resources: Stakeholders can find additional resources on cybersecurity best practices at and Source: Maine Office of the Attorney General, and Source: CBS News Chicago.
Investigation Status
How does the company communicate the status of incident investigations to stakeholders ?
Communication of Investigation Status: The company communicates the status of incident investigations to stakeholders through advisory to affected patients to monitor credit reports and account statements.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
Were there any advisories issued to stakeholders or customers for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Stakeholder Advisories: Patients advised to monitor credit reports and account statements for fraud.
Customer Advisories: UCM Medical Group notified affected patients of the breach and potential risks.
What advisories does the company provide to stakeholders and customers following an incident ?
Advisories Provided: The company provides the following advisories to stakeholders and customers following an incident: were Patients advised to monitor credit reports and account statements for fraud. and UCM Medical Group notified affected patients of the breach and potential risks..
Initial Access Broker
How did the initial access broker gain entry for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
High Value Targets: Patient Pii/Phi, Financial Data,
Data Sold on Dark Web: Patient Pii/Phi, Financial Data,
Post-Incident Analysis
What were the root causes and corrective actions taken for each incident ?
Incident : data breach UNI2190921112725
Root Causes: Third-Party Vendor (Nationwide Recovery Services) Breach, Potential Inadequate Security Controls At Vendor Level,
Additional Questions
Incident Details
What was the most recent incident detected ?
Most Recent Incident Detected: The most recent incident detected was on 2024-03-28.
Impact of the Incidents
What was the most significant data compromised in an incident ?
Most Significant Data Compromised: The most significant data compromised in an incident were Social Security Numbers, , names, birthdates, addresses, Social Security numbers, financial data, medical details and .
Data Breach Information
What was the most sensitive data compromised in a breach ?
Most Sensitive Data Compromised: The most sensitive data compromised in a breach were Social Security numbers, addresses, financial data, medical details, birthdates, names and Social Security Numbers.
What was the number of records exposed in the most significant breach ?
Number of Records Exposed in Most Significant Breach: The number of records exposed in the most significant breach was 38.1K.
Lessons Learned and Recommendations
What was the most significant lesson learned from past incidents ?
Most Significant Lesson Learned: The most significant lesson learned from past incidents was Increased vigilance required for third-party vendor security in the healthcare sector due to rising cybercrime targeting hospitals and patient data.
What was the most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity ?
Most Significant Recommendation Implemented: The most significant recommendation implemented to improve cybersecurity was Enhance third-party vendor risk assessments and security audits., Improve incident response coordination between healthcare providers and third-party vendors., Implement stricter data protection measures for PII/PHI shared with external partners. and Provide credit monitoring services to affected patients..
References
What is the most recent source of information about an incident ?
Most Recent Source: The most recent source of information about an incident are Maine Office of the Attorney General and CBS News Chicago.
Stakeholder and Customer Advisories
What was the most recent stakeholder advisory issued ?
Most Recent Stakeholder Advisory: The most recent stakeholder advisory issued was Patients advised to monitor credit reports and account statements for fraud., .
What was the most recent customer advisory issued ?
Most Recent Customer Advisory: The most recent customer advisory issued was an UCM Medical Group notified affected patients of the breach and potential risks.
.png)
Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)
Description
Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
References
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/0276479e7d0e280e0f8d26fa567d3b7aa97a516f
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/05fe6686a97fa0bcd3cf157805b3612033f975bc
- https://github.com/angular/angular/commit/3240d856d942727372a705252f7c8c115394a41e
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/19.2.16
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/20.3.14
- https://github.com/angular/angular/releases/tag/21.0.1
- https://github.com/angular/angular/security/advisories/GHSA-58c5-g7wp-6w37
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.
Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description
Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.
Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Access Data Using Our API
Get company history
curl -i -X GET 'https://api.rankiteo.com/underwriter-getcompany-history?linkedin_id=center-for-asian-health-equity' -H 'apikey: YOUR_API_KEY_HERE'
RapidWhat Do We Measure ?
Incident
Finding
Grade
Digital Assets
Every week, Rankiteo analyzes billions of signals to give organizations a sharper, faster view of emerging risks. With deeper, more actionable intelligence at their fingertips, security teams can outpace threat actors, respond instantly to Zero-Day attacks, and dramatically shrink their risk exposure window.
These are some of the factors we use to calculate the overall score:
Network Security
Identify exposed access points, detect misconfigured SSL certificates, and uncover vulnerabilities across the network infrastructure.
SBOM (Software Bill of Materials)
Gain visibility into the software components used within an organization to detect vulnerabilities, manage risk, and ensure supply chain security.
CMDB (Configuration Management Database)
Monitor and manage all IT assets and their configurations to ensure accurate, real-time visibility across the company's technology environment.
Threat Intelligence
Leverage real-time insights on active threats, malware campaigns, and emerging vulnerabilities to proactively defend against evolving cyberattacks.
Rankiteo is a unified scoring and risk platform that analyzes billions of signals weekly to help organizations gain faster, more actionable insights into emerging threats. Empowering teams to outpace adversaries and reduce exposure.
