Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)
VS
Aarhus UniversityAarhus University
Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)

Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)

365 fifth Ave, New York City, 10016

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.gc.cuny.edu/case
755/1000Fair

The Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) is an educational research, evaluation and design center at the Graduate Center, CUNY devoted to advancing educational equity and reform nationally and internationally. Since 1975, the center has partnered with a variet...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:34
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Aarhus University

Aarhus University

Nordre Ringgade 1 DK- Aarhus, Aarhus, 8000, DK

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.au.dk
781/1000Fair

About Aarhus University Aarhus University is a leading international research university covering all scientific areas with a staff of 11.000 employees and 44.500 students, the majority are post-graduate students enrolled on Master’s and PhD programmes. Aarhus Univer...

NAICS:N/A
NAICS Definition:Others
Employees:11,052
Subsidiaries:3
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)

Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Aarhus University

Aarhus University

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Aarhus University in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Aarhus University (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Aarhus University cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)

Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Aarhus University

Aarhus University

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) company and Aarhus University company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) and Aarhus University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) and Aarhus University, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) or Aarhus University ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) or Aarhus University ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) and Aarhus University, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Center for Advanced Study in Education (CASE) and Aarhus University, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59723
SUMMARY

Cline is an autonomous coding agent as an SDK, IDE extension, or CLI assistant. Prior to 3.0.30, the Cline Hub dashboard server launched by the cline dashboard command accepts WebSocket connections on the /browser endpoint without validating the Origin header, and when ROOM_SECRET is unset for local 127.0.0.1 binds, isAuthorizedBrowserRequest() allows attacker-controlled websites to send desktopCommand frames that read workspace state, mutate MCP and provider settings, and trigger command execution when a provider or model is configured. This issue is fixed in version 3.0.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-54784
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. In version 1.9.0, CoreWCF SPNEGO SecurityContextToken negotiation can expose the proof key recovered from the RSTR when TransportWithMessageCredential with Windows client credentials and session establishment are used, allowing an observer to impersonate the authenticated Windows principal and decrypt or forge WS-SecureConversation traffic. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54783
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF WS-Security endorsing and supporting signature verification does not ensure the selected ds:Signature covers the expected Security header target, allowing an attacker with one captured signed SOAP envelope to replay arbitrary service operations as the victim principal. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-54782
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML 1.1 and SAML 2.0 token validation does not correctly resolve the issuer signing key or require signed tokens when IdentityConfiguration is used with federated bindings, allowing an unauthenticated remote attacker to impersonate any principal the trusted STS could issue. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 10)
CVSS3
Base Score: 10.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.8
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-54781
SUMMARY

CoreWCF is a port of the service side of Windows Communication Foundation (WCF) to .NET Core. Prior to 1.8.1 and 1.9.1, CoreWCF SAML token validation does not enforce SubjectConfirmation method URIs or holder-of-key proof keys in SamlSecurityTokenHandler, allowing holder-of-key downgrade or custom confirmation method assertions to authenticate a subject without proving authority over the assertion. This issue is fixed in versions 1.8.1 and 1.9.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-08
UPDATED
Date2026-07-08
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2