Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Centene CorporationCentene Corporation
VS
UT Southwestern Medical CenterUT Southwestern Medical Center
Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation

7700 Forsyth Boulevard, Saint Louis, 63105, US

Last Update: 29/07/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.centene.com
736/1000Moderate

Centene Corporation is a leading healthcare enterprise committed to helping people live healthier lives. Centene offers affordable and high-quality products to more than 1 in 15 individuals across the nation, including Medicaid and Medicare members (including Medicare P...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:36,845
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
3
Attack type number
1
UT Southwestern Medical Center

UT Southwestern Medical Center

5323 Harry Hines Boulevard, Dallas, Texas, US, 75390

Last Update: 04/04/2026

View Profile
786/1000Fair

UT Southwestern is an academic medical center, world-renowned for its research, regarded among the best in the country for medical education and for clinical and scientific training, and nationally recognized for the quality of care its faculty provides to patients at U...

NAICS:62
NAICS Definition:Health Care and Social Assistance
Employees:18,678
Subsidiaries:13
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
UT Southwestern Medical Center

UT Southwestern Medical Center

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

Centene Corporation has 28.06% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Hospitals and Health Care Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for UT Southwestern Medical Center in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Centene Corporation (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Centene Corporation cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - UT Southwestern Medical Center (X = Date, Y = Severity)

UT Southwestern Medical Center cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Centene Corporation

Centene Corporation

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
SUNCEN1785364359
🔒 Incident : Breach
CENMER1783968324
🔒 Incident : Breach
CEN18136522
UT Southwestern Medical Center

UT Southwestern Medical Center

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Centene Corporation company and UT Southwestern Medical Center company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Centene Corporation and UT Southwestern Medical Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Centene Corporation and UT Southwestern Medical Center, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Centene Corporation or UT Southwestern Medical Center ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Centene Corporation or UT Southwestern Medical Center ?
Between Centene Corporation and UT Southwestern Medical Center, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Centene Corporation and UT Southwestern Medical Center, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1