Comparison Overview
Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD

Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD
1 Woodside Court, Normanton, WF61SB, GB
Last Update: 25/12/2025
We deliver high quality, timely and cost effective solutions which meet our client expectations for Surveying, Utility Mapping Surveys , PAS128, C2 Utility Searches, UAV, CCTV Drainage Surveys, Substation Engineering and CAD Drawing Management. Delivery of these profes...

EDP
Av. 24 de Julho, Lisboa, 1249 - 300, PT
Last Update: 13/09/2026
Our story began 50 years ago. Today, we are a global energy company leading the transition to a more sustainable future. We produce and deliver electricity to millions of families, businesses and communities worldwide, with a strong focus on renewable energy. More than...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD







EDP






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD in 2026.
Incidents vs Utilities Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for EDP in 2026.
Incident History - Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - EDP (X = Date, Y = Severity)
EDP cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

Centara Ltd - Surveying, Engineering and CAD

EDP
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
Heym from 0.0.55 before 0.0.121 contains a privilege escalation vulnerability that allows shared collaborators to overwrite a workflow's error_workflow_id because the field is missing from OWNER_ONLY_EXECUTION_FIELDS. Attackers can point the error workflow to their own workflow with an HTTP node, and when the parent workflow errors the owner's decrypted credentials are injected and exfiltrated.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.
Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.
Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.