Comparison Overview

Cemex

VS

Carrier

Cemex

Calle Roble, Monterrey, NL, 64460, MX
Last Update: 2025-12-09
Between 750 and 799

Cemex is a global industry leader in producing and supplying cement, aggregates, ready-mix concrete, and urbanization solutions. We’re driving innovation further to solve the world’s building challenges and help the world reach the next frontier of sustainable living. #BuildingABetterFuture Nuestra compañía fue fundada en Monterrey, México, en 1906. Empezamos como una empresa local y, gracias a nuestra visión, evolucionamos hasta convertirnos en una de las compañías globales líderes en nuestra industria. En México contamos con una capacidad de producción anual de 30 millones de toneladas de cemento, operamos con 15 plantas de cemento, 265 plantas de concreto premezclado, 15 canteras de agregados, 78 centro de distribución terrestre y 7 terminales marítimas. Construimos un mejor futuro gracias a nuestro afán de innovar a través de una oferta de productos y soluciones integrales de calidad y de un proceso operativo eficiente y seguro que respeta el medio ambiente.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 22,319
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Carrier

13995 Pasteur Blvd, Palm Beach Gardens, Florida, 33418, US
Last Update: 2025-12-09

Carrier Global Corporation, global leader in intelligent climate and energy solutions, is committed to making the world safer, sustainable and more comfortable for generations to come. From the beginning, we’ve led in inventing new technologies and entirely new industries. Today, we continue to lead because we have a world-class, diverse workforce that puts the customer at the center of everything we do. For more information, visit www.Corporate.Carrier.com.

NAICS: 4233
NAICS Definition: Lumber and Other Construction Materials Merchant Wholesalers
Employees: 20,398
Subsidiaries: 1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cemex.jpeg
Cemex
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrier.jpeg
Carrier
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Cemex
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Carrier
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cemex in 2025.

Incidents vs Wholesale Building Materials Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Carrier in 2025.

Incident History — Cemex (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cemex cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Carrier (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Carrier cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cemex.jpeg
Cemex
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/carrier.jpeg
Carrier
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Cemex company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Carrier company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Carrier company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Cemex company.

In the current year, Carrier company and Cemex company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Carrier company nor Cemex company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Carrier company nor Cemex company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Carrier company nor Cemex company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Cemex company nor Carrier company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Carrier company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Cemex company.

Cemex company employs more people globally than Carrier company, reflecting its scale as a Wholesale Building Materials.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Cemex nor Carrier holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

NXLog Agent before 6.11 can load a file specified by the OPENSSL_CONF environment variable.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 8.1
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

uriparser through 0.9.9 allows unbounded recursion and stack consumption, as demonstrated by ParseMustBeSegmentNzNc with large input containing many commas.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 2.9
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
Description

A vulnerability was detected in Mayan EDMS up to 4.10.1. The affected element is an unknown function of the file /authentication/. The manipulation results in cross site scripting. The attack may be performed from remote. The exploit is now public and may be used. Upgrading to version 4.10.2 is sufficient to fix this issue. You should upgrade the affected component. The vendor confirms that this is "[f]ixed in version 4.10.2". Furthermore, that "[b]ackports for older versions in process and will be out as soon as their respective CI pipelines complete."

Risk Information
cvss2
Base: 5.0
Severity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:N/C:N/I:P/A:N
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
cvss4
Base: 5.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

MJML through 4.18.0 allows mj-include directory traversal to test file existence and (in the type="css" case) read files. NOTE: this issue exists because of an incomplete fix for CVE-2020-12827.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.5
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:L/I:N/A:L
Description

A half-blind Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in kube-controller-manager when using the in-tree Portworx StorageClass. This vulnerability allows authorized users to leak arbitrary information from unprotected endpoints in the control plane’s host network (including link-local or loopback services).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.8
Severity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N