Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cellnex TelecomCellnex Telecom
VS
Millicom (Tigo)Millicom (Tigo)
Cellnex Telecom

Cellnex Telecom

Passeig Zona Franca, 105, Barcelona, Barcelona, ES, 08038

Last Update: 19/07/2026

View Profile
Between 550 and 599
https://www.cellnex.com
596/1000Very Poor

Cellnex is Europe’s largest telecommunications towers and infrastructures operator, enabling operators to access a wide network of telecommunications infrastructures on a shared-use basis, and thus helping to reduce access barriers and to improve services in the most re...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:2,557
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (Tigo)

2 Rue du Fort Bourbon, Luxembourg, 1249, LU

Last Update: 05/07/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.millicom.com
790/1000Fair

Millicom (NASDAQ U.S.: TIGO, Nasdaq) is a leading provider of fixed and mobile telecommunications services in Latin America. Through our TIGO® and Tigo Business® brands, we provide a wide range of digital services and products, including TIGO Money for mobile financial ...

NAICS:517
NAICS Definition:Telecommunications
Employees:29,169
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cellnex Telecom

Cellnex Telecom

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (Tigo)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

Cellnex Telecom has 47.37% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs Telecommunications Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Millicom (Tigo) in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cellnex Telecom (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cellnex Telecom cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Millicom (Tigo) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Millicom (Tigo) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cellnex Telecom

Cellnex Telecom

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
MTNMULCELACCMINCYB1767603186
Millicom (Tigo)

Millicom (Tigo)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cellnex Telecom company and Millicom (Tigo) company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cellnex Telecom and Millicom (Tigo), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cellnex Telecom and Millicom (Tigo), which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cellnex Telecom or Millicom (Tigo) ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cellnex Telecom or Millicom (Tigo) ?
Between Cellnex Telecom and Millicom (Tigo), which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cellnex Telecom and Millicom (Tigo), which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66591
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in David Lingren Media LIbrary Assistant allows Stored XSS. This issue affects Media LIbrary Assistant: from n/a through 3.39.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3
CVE-2026-66589
SUMMARY

Missing Authorization vulnerability in Kings Plugins B2BKing allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects B2BKing: from n/a through 5.2.30.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-27365
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in PublishPress PublishPress Series allows Stored XSS. This issue affects PublishPress Series: from n/a through 2.17.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.7
CVE-2026-73974
SUMMARY

linuxfabrik-lib provides Python modules for database access, caching, shell execution, and API integrations, and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins uses its shared testing helper across check plugins. Prior to linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0, lib.lftest.test() treated the first or second element of a --test CSV argument as a filesystem path and returned the file contents as simulated standard output or standard error without path confinement. The hidden but production-accessible --test argument was accepted by sudo-authorized plugins, so an attacker controlling the nagios or icinga account could use check-plugins/deb-updates/deb-updates with its default QUERY=1 to disclose every line of a root-readable file. Approximately 22 other plugins exposed filtered content or a root file existence and readability oracle through the same helper, while check-plugins/network-bonding/network-bonding and check-plugins/openstack-swift-stat/openstack-swift-stat had direct read paths that bypassed the helper. The library fix confines fixture reads to the invoking plugin's unit-test directory and refuses unsafe anchors, and the plugin fix routes the two bypasses through that helper. These issues are fixed in linuxfabrik-lib 6.1.0 and Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-73973
SUMMARY

Linuxfabrik Monitoring Plugins provides monitoring plugins for Icinga, Nagios, and related systems. Prior to version 7.0.0, check-plugins/logfile/logfile accepted a free-form --filename path and opened it as root when invoked through the shipped nagios or icinga sudoers allowlist, without confining the resolved path to /var/log. An attacker who controls the monitoring account can select a root-readable file such as /etc/shadow and use --warning-regex . while leaving SUPPRESS_OUTPUT false, causing each nonempty line to be collected in warn_matches and returned through lib.base.oao(). The vulnerable flow passes the expanded scan_path directly to open(), and neither real-path containment nor an allowlist protects the sink. The same fix also confines mysql-logfile and openvpn-client-list paths, allows only documented log roots, and resolves symlinks and parent-directory traversal before checking containment. This issue is fixed in version 7.0.0.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-18
UPDATED
Date2026-08-18
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8