Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and RetrievalSartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval
VS
Thermo Fisher ScientificThermo Fisher Scientific
Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval

Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval

Otto-Brenner Straße 20, Göttingen, 37079, DE

Last Update: 01/02/2026

View Profile

Sartorius is a leading international partner of life science research and the biopharmaceutical industry. Our ambition is to simplify progress in biopharmaceutical research and production. We support our customers with innovative technologies that make the development a...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:4
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific

168 Third Avenue, Waltham, MA, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
https://www.thermofisher.com
825/1000Good

About Thermo Fisher Scientific Thermo Fisher Scientific Inc. is the world leader in serving science, with annual revenue of approximately $40 billion. Our Mission is to enable our customers to make the world healthier, cleaner and safer. Whether our customers are accele...

NAICS:541714
NAICS Definition:Research and Development in Biotechnology (except Nanobiotechnology)
Employees:99,125
Subsidiaries:18
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval

Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Biotechnology Research Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Thermo Fisher Scientific in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Thermo Fisher Scientific (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Thermo Fisher Scientific cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval

Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Thermo Fisher Scientific

Thermo Fisher Scientific

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE206072925

FAQ

Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval company and Thermo Fisher Scientific company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval or Thermo Fisher Scientific ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval or Thermo Fisher Scientific ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Sartorius | CellCelector – Automated Cell Selection and Retrieval and Thermo Fisher Scientific, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-59705
SUMMARY

mem0's openmemory/api component contains an unauthenticated access vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to read, write, and delete arbitrary user memories by accessing API routers registered without authentication middleware. Attackers can supply arbitrary user_id parameters or directly access memory retrieval endpoints to expose private memory content, or invoke pause endpoints with global_pause=true to cause denial-of-service across all users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59704
SUMMARY

Cap's GET /api/video/ai endpoint fails to validate user ownership or membership before returning private video AI metadata including titles, summaries, and chapters. Authenticated attackers can supply arbitrary video IDs to read sensitive AI-generated content and trigger unauthorized AI generation that consumes the video owner's credits without consent.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55078
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Starting in version 2.17.0 and prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, `POST /api/v2/files` converts zip uploads to tar in memory via `CreateTarFromZip`, which enforced a per-entry size limit but no aggregate limit on total decompressed output, writing to an unbounded in-memory buffer. Exploitation requires authenticated file-upload access and the impact is limited to availability (denial of service). The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 adds a metadata preflight check that sums projected entry sizes and a streaming writer that enforces the aggregate limit during decompression. As a workaround, restrict file-upload permissions to trusted users or place a reverse proxy with request-body size limits in front of `coderd`.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-55077
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, the `PUT /api/v2/users/{user}/password` endpoint authorized only `ActionUpdatePersonal` and did not prevent a `user-admin` from resetting an `owner` account's password. It also did not require the current password when an admin reset another user's password. Exploitation requires the privileged `user-admin` role so practical risk is limited to deployments that grant `user-admin` to less trusted operators. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 prevents non-owner users from resetting the password of an account that holds the `owner` role. As a workaround, restrict the `user-admin` role to trusted administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
CVE-2026-55076
SUMMARY

Coder allows organizations to provision remote development environments via Terraform. Prior to versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2, Coder's OIDC callback checked `email_verified` with a direct Go `bool` type assertion. When an IdP returned the claim as a non-boolean (for example the string `"false"`) or omitted it, the assertion failed open and the email was treated as verified. Combined with an unconditional email-based account fallback, this enabled account takeover. The fix in versions 2.29.7, 2.32.7, 2.33.8, and 2.34.2 coerces `email_verified` across bool, string and numeric types (fail-closed) and blocks the email fallback when the matched user already has a different linked IdP subject. As a workaround, ensure the IdP returns `email_verified` as a native JSON boolean. The email-fallback linking issue has no configuration workaround; upgrading is required.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-07
UPDATED
Date2026-07-07
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.4
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2