Comparison Overview

Celestica

VS

Prysmian

Celestica

5140 Yonge St, Toronto, Ontario, M2N 6L7, CA
Last Update: 2026-01-18
Between 800 and 849

Celestica enables the world's best brands. Through our unrivaled customer-centric approach, we partner with leading companies in aerospace and defense, communications, enterprise, healthtech, industrial, capital equipment, and smart energy to deliver solutions for their most complex challenges. A leader in design, manufacturing, hardware platform and supply chain solutions, Celestica brings global expertise and insight at every stage of product development - from the drawing board to full-scale production and after-market services. With talented teams across North America, Europe and Asia, we imagine, develop and deliver a better future with our customers. We operate in more than 40 locations globally. Consult our website for detailed location information. https://www.celestica.com/about-us/locations

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 14,179
Subsidiaries: 4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Prysmian

Via Chiese 6, Milan, Italy, IT, 20126
Last Update: 2026-01-23

Prysmian is a global cabling solutions provider leading the energy transition and digital transformation. By leveraging its wide geographical footprint and extensive product range, its track record of technological leadership and innovation, and a strong customer base, the company is well-placed to capitalise on its leading positions and win in new, growing markets. Prysmian’s business strategy perfectly matches key market drivers by developing resilient, high-performing, sustainable and innovative cable solutions in the segments of Transmission, Power Grid, Electrification and Digital Solutions. Prysmian is a public company listed on the Italian Stock Exchange, with almost 150 years of experience, over 33,000 employees, 109 plants and 27 R&D centres in over 50 countries, and sales of over €17 billion in 2024.

NAICS: 30
NAICS Definition: Manufacturing
Employees: 14,539
Subsidiaries: 2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/celestica.jpeg
Celestica
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prysmian.jpeg
Prysmian
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Celestica
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Prysmian
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Celestica in 2026.

Incidents vs Manufacturing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Prysmian in 2026.

Incident History — Celestica (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Celestica cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Prysmian (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Prysmian cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/celestica.jpeg
Celestica
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/prysmian.jpeg
Prysmian
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

Celestica company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Prysmian company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Prysmian company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to Celestica company.

In the current year, Prysmian company and Celestica company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Prysmian company nor Celestica company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Prysmian company nor Celestica company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Prysmian company nor Celestica company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither Celestica company nor Prysmian company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Celestica company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to Prysmian company.

Prysmian company employs more people globally than Celestica company, reflecting its scale as a Manufacturing.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Celestica nor Prysmian holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Typemill is a flat-file, Markdown-based CMS designed for informational documentation websites. A reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) exists in the login error view template `login.twig` of versions 2.19.1 and below. The `username` value can be echoed back without proper contextual encoding when authentication fails. An attacker can execute script in the login page context. This issue has been fixed in version 2.19.2.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 5.4
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
Description

A DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability exists in the DomainCheckerApp class within domain/script.js of Sourcecodester Domain Availability Checker v1.0. The vulnerability occurs because the application improperly handles user-supplied data in the createResultElement method by using the unsafe innerHTML property to render domain search results.

Description

A Remote Code Execution (RCE) vulnerability exists in Sourcecodester Modern Image Gallery App v1.0 within the gallery/upload.php component. The application fails to properly validate uploaded file contents. Additionally, the application preserves the user-supplied file extension during the save process. This allows an unauthenticated attacker to upload arbitrary PHP code by spoofing the MIME type as an image, leading to full system compromise.

Description

A UNIX symbolic link following issue in the jailer component in Firecracker version v1.13.1 and earlier and 1.14.0 on Linux may allow a local host user with write access to the pre-created jailer directories to overwrite arbitrary host files via a symlink attack during the initialization copy at jailer startup, if the jailer is executed with root privileges. To mitigate this issue, users should upgrade to version v1.13.2 or 1.14.1 or above.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
cvss4
Base: 6.0
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:N/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

An information disclosure vulnerability exists in the /srvs/membersrv/getCashiers endpoint of the Aptsys gemscms backend platform thru 2025-05-28. This unauthenticated endpoint returns a list of cashier accounts, including names, email addresses, usernames, and passwords hashed using MD5. As MD5 is a broken cryptographic function, the hashes can be easily reversed using public tools, exposing user credentials in plaintext. This allows remote attackers to perform unauthorized logins and potentially gain access to sensitive POS operations or backend functions.