Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CEIBS MBA ProgrammeCEIBS MBA Programme
VS
University of California, DavisUniversity of California, Davis
CEIBS MBA Programme

CEIBS MBA Programme

699 Hongfeng Road, Shanghai, CN

Last Update: 26/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.ceibs.edu/mba
766/1000Fair

At the China Europe International Business School (CEIBS), we take great pride in providing a transformative MBA programme that seamlessly integrates insights and innovations from both Eastern and Western perspectives. Our mission is to prepare ambitious professionals f...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:1
Subsidiaries:2
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
University of California, Davis

University of California, Davis

1 Shields Ave, Davis, California, US, 95616

Last Update: 05/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://ucdavis.edu
806/1000Good

UC Davis was founded in 1908 to serve the state of California. We do and we always will. Today, that seed planted years ago has grown into one of the world’s top universities. UC Davis has a community of faculty and staff who are leading the way in teaching, research, ...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:21,175
Subsidiaries:50
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CEIBS MBA Programme

CEIBS MBA Programme

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
University of California, Davis

University of California, Davis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CEIBS MBA Programme in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

University of California, Davis has 88.68% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - CEIBS MBA Programme (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CEIBS MBA Programme cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - University of California, Davis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

University of California, Davis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CEIBS MBA Programme

CEIBS MBA Programme

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
University of California, Davis

University of California, Davis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
KERTHECAL1778192774
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
UC-1778200668

FAQ

Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme company and University of California, Davis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme and University of California, Davis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme and University of California, Davis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CEIBS MBA Programme or University of California, Davis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CEIBS MBA Programme or University of California, Davis ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme and University of California, Davis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CEIBS MBA Programme and University of California, Davis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA