Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cegedim OutsourcingCegedim Outsourcing
VS
Allianz TechnologyAllianz Technology
Cegedim Outsourcing

Cegedim Outsourcing

15, rue Paul Dautier, Vélizy-Villacoublay, 78140, FR

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
752/1000Fair

Cegedim Outsourcing, business unit Cegedim, est spécialisée dans deux domaines d'activité : IT et BPO. Notre expertise technique de haut niveau, associée à l’appartenance à un des plus grands groupes français d’informatique confère à Cegedim Outsourcing un position...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:232
Subsidiaries:16
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

Dieselstraße 8, Unterföhring, Bavaria, DE, 85774

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile

With its headquarters in Munich, Germany, Allianz Technology is Allianz's global IT service provider and delivers IT solutions that drive the group's digitalization. With more than 11,000 employees in more than 20 countries around the world, Allianz Technology is tasked...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:11,516
Subsidiaries:130
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cegedim Outsourcing

Cegedim Outsourcing

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cegedim Outsourcing in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Allianz Technology in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cegedim Outsourcing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cegedim Outsourcing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Allianz Technology (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Allianz Technology cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cegedim Outsourcing

Cegedim Outsourcing

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Allianz Technology

Allianz Technology

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing company and Allianz Technology company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing and Allianz Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing and Allianz Technology, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cegedim Outsourcing or Allianz Technology ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cegedim Outsourcing or Allianz Technology ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing and Allianz Technology, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cegedim Outsourcing and Allianz Technology, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-89096
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in nfs-utils. An unauthenticated remote attacker can trigger a Denial of Service (DoS) by sending repeated state notification requests to an exposed rpc.statd service. The service fails to properly release memory allocated during callback processing, leading to continuous memory growth. Sustained requests can exhaust system resources, eventually causing the service to degrade or crash.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-89088
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow exists in libparted's file system resizing logic when handling FAT16 volumes. By convincing a user or administrator to resize a specially crafted FAT16 file system image with malformed directory metadata, an attacker can trigger an oversized read into a fixed-size memory buffer. This issue causes memory corruption, resulting in an application crash and a denial of service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-89085
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in parted. A heap-based buffer overflow can occur when processing a specially crafted FAT32 filesystem due to an integer calculation error during buffer allocation. A local attacker could exploit this by enticing a user or automated service to open a malicious filesystem image, resulting in an application crash leading to a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential memory corruption.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
4.7
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-17591
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in libarchive. An attacker can cause a Denial of Service (DoS) or potential information disclosure due to a use-after-free vulnerability, which occurs when a program reads memory that has already been released. This issue arises when the archive_entry_copy_mac_metadata() function deallocates an internal buffer before completing a data copy. An attacker who can supply input to an application utilizing this function can trigger the flaw to crash the application or read uninitialized memory data.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.6
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1
CVE-2026-111802
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Nautilus. When a removable drive or disk image is unmounted or ejected, Nautilus prompts the user to empty the trash without verifying whether the trash directory paths are symbolic links. An attacker can exploit this flaw by tricking a user into mounting a crafted storage volume and confirming the prompt to empty the trash, leading to the arbitrary deletion of files accessible to that user.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-16
UPDATED
Date2026-10-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.6)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.6
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
1.3