Comparison Overview
Cegedim Assurances
Cegedim Assurances
114 rue d'Aguesseau, Boulogne Billancourt, 92 100, FR
Last Update: 29/01/2026
Cegedim Insurance Solutions is an innovative company serving the transformation for life and health insurance players: Insurance companies, Mutuals, Provident institutions and Brokers, in France and internationally. To do so, Cegedim Insurance Solutions offers both SaaS...
Sutherland
1160 Pittsford-Victor Road, Pittsford (Rochester), NY, US, 14534
Last Update: 14/09/2026
Artificial Intelligence. Automation. Cloud Engineering. Advanced Analytics. For Enterprises, these are key factors of success. For us, they’re our core expertise. We work with global iconic brands. We bring them a unique value proposition through market-leading techn...
Compliance Ranges Comparison
Cegedim Assurances
Sutherland
Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cegedim Assurances in 2026.
Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Sutherland in 2026.
Incident History - Cegedim Assurances (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cegedim Assurances cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Sutherland (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Sutherland cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents
Cegedim Assurances
Sutherland
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to properly clean up decode-side metadata for rejected inference requests in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Remote attackers can submit requests with max_tokens=0 to exhaust decode-worker memory without bound until the worker restarts.
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/blob/v0.29.0/vllm/distributed/kv_transfer/kv_connector/v1/nixl/push_worker.py#L162-L181
- https://github.com/vllm-project/vllm/pull/55677
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/vllm-through-0.29.0-memory-exhaustion-via-rejected-requests
redis-parser through 3.0.0 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the RESP protocol parser that allows malicious Redis endpoints to crash the client process through unbounded recursion on nested arrays. Attackers can send crafted RESP byte streams with repeated array headers that exhaust the V8 call stack, causing an uncaught RangeError that terminates the Node.js process without triggering error handling callbacks.
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser/blob/701655430f5f7d9ca00892a02f7eefcbc1193a98/lib/parser.js#L204-L213
- https://github.com/NodeRedis/node-redis-parser/blob/701655430f5f7d9ca00892a02f7eefcbc1193a98/lib/parser.js#L291-L306
- https://github.com/redis/ioredis/issues/2108
- https://www.vulncheck.com/advisories/redis-parser-through-3.0.0-denial-of-service-via-unbounded-recursion
Improper neutralization of special elements in output used by a downstream component ('injection') in Azure Cosmos DB allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
Missing authentication for critical function in Azure AI Foundry allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.