Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cegedim EgyptCegedim Egypt
VS
LexisNexisLexisNexis
Cegedim Egypt

Cegedim Egypt

44 North Tesseen St., Fifth Settlement, New Cairo, 11835, EG

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cegedim.com
751/1000Fair

In Cegedim it has been over 50 years of growth, innovation, and human adventure. Our value and our difference: it is our employees. Quality and investment are at the heart of Cegedim group, and our growth strategy is based on well-built values to innovate and optimize t...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:75
Subsidiaries:17
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

230 Park Avenue, New York City, 10017, US

Last Update: 23/06/2026

View Profile

LexisNexis is a leading innovator of private, secure, and authoritative Legal AI solutions that help legal and business professionals draft full documents with ease, make informed decisions faster, and deliver outstanding work and improved outcomes, all powered by trust...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:10,705
Subsidiaries:72
12-month incidents
4
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cegedim Egypt

Cegedim Egypt

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cegedim Egypt in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

LexisNexis has 277.36% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Cegedim Egypt (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cegedim Egypt cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - LexisNexis (X = Date, Y = Severity)

LexisNexis cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cegedim Egypt

Cegedim Egypt

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
LexisNexis

LexisNexis

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
FORCISTELLEXSALCHAIVACAROPESTR1782226177
🔒 Incident : Breach
RELLEX1772562253
🔒 Incident : Breach
LEX1772555037

FAQ

Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cegedim Egypt company and LexisNexis company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cegedim Egypt and LexisNexis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cegedim Egypt and LexisNexis, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cegedim Egypt or LexisNexis ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cegedim Egypt or LexisNexis ?
Between Cegedim Egypt and LexisNexis, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cegedim Egypt and LexisNexis, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-49416
SUMMARY

The CONS_HISTORY ioctl handler did not adequately validate the requested history size. A large value caused an integer overflow in the buffer size calculation, resulting in a heap allocation smaller than expected. Subsequent initialization of the buffer wrote beyond the end of the allocation. An unprivileged local user with access to a vt(4) device can trigger an out-of-bounds write in the kernel, potentially escalating privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49414
SUMMARY

The ELF image activator cleared per-process ASLR preference flags for setuid binaries after the code that computes the PIE base address, rather than before. As a result, a user-requested ASLR disable was still in effect at the point where the base address was chosen. An unprivileged local user can disable ASLR for a setuid PIE binary by calling procctl(2) before execve(2). This makes exploitation of any separate memory corruption vulnerability in that binary significantly easier.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49417
SUMMARY

Second, the audio buffer backing a mapping could be freed when the device was closed even though the mapping remained valid. The freed memory could then be reused elsewhere while still accessible through the stale mapping. The /dev/dsp device nodes are world-accessible by default. On a system with an audio device, either issue allows an unprivileged local user to read and write kernel memory, which can be used to escalate privileges, potentially gaining full control of the affected system. At a minimum, an attacker can crash the kernel, resulting in a Denial of Service (DoS).

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49413
SUMMARY

The Linuxulator determined whether a binary was set-user-ID or set-group-ID by checking the P_SUGID process flag. During execve(2), this flag is not yet set at the point where the auxiliary vector is constructed, so AT_SECURE was incorrectly set to zero for set-user-ID and set-group-ID executables. An unprivileged local user can inject a shared library via LD_PRELOAD into a set-user-ID or set-group-ID Linux binary, gaining the privileges of that binary.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-49412
SUMMARY

The kernel handler for IPV6_MSFILTER dropped a serializing lock in order to copy the source-filter list from userspace, then reacquired the lock. During this window another thread could free the multicast filter structure, leaving the handler with a stale pointer to freed memory. An unprivileged local user can exploit this use-after-free to escalate privileges.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-27
UPDATED
Date2026-06-27
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA