Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Cedar Point Amusement ParkCedar Point Amusement Park
VS
The Walt Disney CompanyThe Walt Disney Company
Cedar Point Amusement Park

Cedar Point Amusement Park

1 Cedar Point Dr, Sandusky, Ohio, 44870, US

Last Update: 09/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cedarpoint.com
767/1000Fair

Cedar Point in Sandusky, Ohio, is A Place Like No Other™. The second-oldest amusement park in North America is home to 70 rides, including 18 roller coasters, the Cedar Point Shores Waterpark, three kids’ areas, overnight accommodations, live shows, a mile-long beach, s...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:913
Subsidiaries:32
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company, Burbank, 91521, US

Last Update: 03/06/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://www.disneycareers.com
663/1000Weak

The Walt Disney Company, together with its subsidiaries and affiliates, is a leading diversified international family entertainment and media enterprise that includes three core business segments: Disney Entertainment, ESPN, and Disney Experiences. Our mission is to en...

NAICS:71
NAICS Definition:Arts, Entertainment, and Recreation
Employees:183,295
Subsidiaries:57
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
6
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cedar Point Amusement Park

Cedar Point Amusement Park

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cedar Point Amusement Park in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Entertainment Providers Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The Walt Disney Company in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cedar Point Amusement Park (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cedar Point Amusement Park cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The Walt Disney Company (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The Walt Disney Company cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cedar Point Amusement Park

Cedar Point Amusement Park

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The Walt Disney Company

The Walt Disney Company

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
TOYTHEFED1773051888
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
HIT2032020092925
🔒 Incident : Breach
THE409030225

FAQ

Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park company and The Walt Disney Company company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park and The Walt Disney Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park and The Walt Disney Company, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cedar Point Amusement Park or The Walt Disney Company ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cedar Point Amusement Park or The Walt Disney Company ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park and The Walt Disney Company, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cedar Point Amusement Park and The Walt Disney Company, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1