Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CebraceCebrace
VS
Corning IncorporatedCorning Incorporated
Cebrace

Cebrace

Av. do Cristal, 540, Jacareí, SP, 12311-900, BR

Last Update: 04/12/2025

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.cebrace.com.br
762/1000Fair

A Cebrace é fruto de uma joint-venture entre dois dos maiores grupos produtores de vidro plano do mundo: a NSG/Pilkington e Saint-Gobain. Fundada em 1974, reúne em seu processo de fabricação o know-how e a tecnologia de dois gigantes do setor de vidros. Além disso, é a...

NAICS:327
NAICS Definition:Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
Employees:1,111
Subsidiaries:87
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Corning Incorporated

Corning Incorporated

One Riverfront Plaza, Corning, 14831, US

Last Update: 01/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.corning.com
754/1000Fair

Corning is one of the world's leading innovators in materials science, with a 170+ year track record of life-changing inventions. Corning applies its unparalleled expertise in glass science, ceramics science, and optical physics along with its deep manufacturing and eng...

NAICS:327
NAICS Definition:Nonmetallic Mineral Product Manufacturing
Employees:21,124
Subsidiaries:8
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Cebrace

Cebrace

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Corning Incorporated

Corning Incorporated

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Glass, Ceramics and Concrete Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Cebrace in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Glass, Ceramics and Concrete Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corning Incorporated in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Cebrace (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Cebrace cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Corning Incorporated (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corning Incorporated cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Cebrace

Cebrace

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Corning Incorporated

Corning Incorporated

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
COR0503422

FAQ

Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Cebrace company and Corning Incorporated company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Cebrace and Corning Incorporated, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Cebrace and Corning Incorporated, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Cebrace or Corning Incorporated ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Cebrace or Corning Incorporated ?
Between Cebrace and Corning Incorporated, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Cebrace and Corning Incorporated, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-74250
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Ironic before 38.0.1, the autodetect deploy interface may fail to run cleaning immediately after enrollment with, or changing to, the autodetect deploy interface.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.3
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-74247
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. A user with FEATURE_BUILD_SUPPORT enabled and repository write access can exploit a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability within the build API. This allows the user to provide a malicious URL, causing the Quay builder to make requests to internal network addresses. Such an action could lead to the disclosure of sensitive internal information.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.2
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-74245
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's exported logs feature. An unauthenticated attacker with a valid file ID could download exported action logs without proper authorization. While file IDs are complex, they can be intercepted from plaintext email or webhook callbacks. This vulnerability leads to information disclosure, potentially exposing sensitive data such as usernames, email addresses, IP addresses, and action-specific metadata.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74244
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay's Stripe billing webhook handler. This vulnerability allows an unauthenticated attacker to forge billing events by sending crafted JSON requests to the `/webhooks/stripe` endpoint without validating the Stripe-Signature header. Successful exploitation can lead to the unauthorized resetting of a namespace's build quota to its maximum and trigger unsolicited billing emails to namespace administrators.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.9
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.2
CVE-2026-74243
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Red Hat Quay. When the SECURITY_SCANNER_V4_PSK (pre-shared key) is not set, a remote unauthenticated attacker can send POST requests to the security scanner notification endpoint. This allows the attacker to flood the notification queue and inject path traversal characters into Clair API URL paths. The primary consequence is worker resource exhaustion and blind path manipulation on the configured Clair host, potentially leading to a denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-08-14
UPDATED
Date2026-08-14
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9