Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)
VS
DesjardinsDesjardins
Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)

Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)

Avenue Françoise Giroud, Dijon, Bourgogne-Franche-Comté 21000, FR

Last Update: 25/04/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.caisse-epargne.fr
756/1000Fair

La Caisse d’Epargne de Bourgogne Franche-Comté est une banque coopérative régionale au service du développement économique et social de son territoire. Grâce à une situation financière solide, elle poursuit un développement ambitieux. Son capital social est détenu par s...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:0
Subsidiaries:41
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Desjardins

Desjardins

100, rue des Commandeurs, Lévis, G6V 7N5, CA

Last Update: 11/09/2026

View Profile
494/1000Critical

Desjardins Group is the largest cooperative financial group in North America and the fifth largest cooperative financial group in the world, with assets of $435.8 billion as at March 31, 2024. It was named one of Canada's Best Employers by Forbes magazine and by Mediaco...

NAICS:52211
NAICS Definition:Commercial Banking
Employees:44,288
Subsidiaries:7
12-month incidents
2
Known data breaches
7
Attack type number
1

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)

Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Desjardins

Desjardins

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Banking Industry Avg (This Year)

Desjardins has 96.08% more incidents than the average of all companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incident History - Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Desjardins (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Desjardins cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)

Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Desjardins

Desjardins

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
DES1784220391
🔒 Incident : Breach
DESSK-DOL1770631353
🔒 Incident : Breach
DES1767941129

FAQ

Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) company and Desjardins company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) and Desjardins, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) and Desjardins, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) or Desjardins ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) or Desjardins ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) and Desjardins, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Caisse d'Epargne Bourgogne Franche-Comté (CEBFC) and Desjardins, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-94426
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was determined in xuxueli xxl-job up to 3.5.0. The impacted element is an unknown function of the file /jobgroup/insert. This manipulation of the argument Name causes cross site scripting. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been publicly disclosed and may be utilized. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 3.5)
CVSS2
Base Score: 4.0
Complexity: LOW
AV:N/AC:L/Au:S/C:N/I:P/A:N
CVSS3
Base Score: 3.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 2.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:P/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-94425
SUMMARY

A vulnerability was found in Moore Threads MTT S80 Driver Package 340.150. The affected element is the function sub_140006F0C in the library mtdispkm64.sys of the component IOCTL Handler. The manipulation results in improper privilege management. Attacking locally is a requirement. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS2
Base Score: 6.8
Complexity: LOW
AV:L/AC:L/Au:S/C:C/I:C/A:C
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2
CVE-2026-94627
SUMMARY

vLLM Mooncake connector through 0.29.0 fails to properly manage GPU KV cache block ownership when concurrent child requests share a single transfer ID in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments. Attackers can trigger GPU memory exhaustion by submitting completion requests with multiple prompts, causing orphaned KV cache blocks to accumulate until process restart and eventually preventing legitimate requests from executing.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94626
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 fails to validate the tp_size parameter in kv_transfer_params on OpenAI-compatible completion endpoints, allowing attackers to allocate unbounded memory. Attackers can supply arbitrary tp_size values in prefill/decode disaggregated deployments to exhaust memory and trigger kernel OOM-kill of the decode worker process.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-94625
SUMMARY

vLLM through 0.29.0 contains a resource exhaustion vulnerability in MooncakeConnector where rejected prefill requests create ownerless transfer placeholders that are never reclaimed. Attackers can send rejected requests to exhaust sender task pools, causing valid requests to be delayed by up to 480 seconds while health checks continue returning success.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-21
UPDATED
Date2026-09-21
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9