Comparison Overview

CDO Magazine

VS

Tuttle Publishing

CDO Magazine

None
Last Update: 2025-11-21
Between 750 and 799

CDO Magazine grew out of MIT’s annual CDO and Information Quality Symposium (MIT CDOIQ), led since 2007 by the MIT Sloan School of Management, in partnership with the International Society of Chief Data Officers (isCDO) and ComSpark. Our vision and mission are to be the premier global print and digital publication, giving a voice to global leaders in strategic data management and analytics capabilities that form the foundation and core of the digital age. The publication delivers C-suite-worthy format and content quality — the insights essential to accelerating organizational adoption of the enterprise disciplines necessary to be successful in the new digital society. Our passion is to be a catalyst where global data and analytics leaders can experience a deeper sense of community by creating a platform where the best ideas, innovations, companies, and leaders are celebrated.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 147
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Tuttle Publishing

364 Innovation Dr, North Clarendon, Vermont, 05759, US
Last Update: 2025-11-28

MISSION: The Tuttle Publishing company was founded in 1832 in the small New England town of Rutland, Vermont [USA] — making it one of the oldest American publishers in operation today. Our core values remain as strong today as they were then—to publish best-in-class books which bring people together one page at a time. Since 1948, when the company established a publishing outpost in Japan, Tuttle has become a leader in producing English-language books about the arts, languages and cultures of Asia. The world has now become a much smaller place, while Asia’s economic and cultural influence has grown tremendously. Yet the need for meaningful dialogue and information about this diverse region has never been greater.

NAICS: 511
NAICS Definition: Publishing Industries (except Internet)
Employees: 51
Subsidiaries: 0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdo-magazine.jpeg
CDO Magazine
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuttle-publishing.jpeg
Tuttle Publishing
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
CDO Magazine
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
Tuttle Publishing
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDO Magazine in 2025.

Incidents vs Book and Periodical Publishing Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Tuttle Publishing in 2025.

Incident History — CDO Magazine (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDO Magazine cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — Tuttle Publishing (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Tuttle Publishing cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cdo-magazine.jpeg
CDO Magazine
Incidents

No Incident

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/tuttle-publishing.jpeg
Tuttle Publishing
Incidents

No Incident

FAQ

CDO Magazine company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to Tuttle Publishing company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

Historically, Tuttle Publishing company has disclosed a higher number of cyber incidents compared to CDO Magazine company.

In the current year, Tuttle Publishing company and CDO Magazine company have not reported any cyber incidents.

Neither Tuttle Publishing company nor CDO Magazine company has reported experiencing a ransomware attack publicly.

Neither Tuttle Publishing company nor CDO Magazine company has reported experiencing a data breach publicly.

Neither Tuttle Publishing company nor CDO Magazine company has reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks publicly.

Neither CDO Magazine company nor Tuttle Publishing company has reported experiencing or disclosing vulnerabilities publicly.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Neither CDO Magazine company nor Tuttle Publishing company has publicly disclosed detailed information about the number of their subsidiaries.

CDO Magazine company employs more people globally than Tuttle Publishing company, reflecting its scale as a Book and Periodical Publishing.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds HIPAA certification.

Neither CDO Magazine nor Tuttle Publishing holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

ThingsBoard in versions prior to v4.2.1 allows an authenticated user to upload malicious SVG images via the "Image Gallery", leading to a Stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. The exploit can be triggered when any user accesses the public API endpoint of the malicious SVG images, or if the malicious images are embedded in an `iframe` element, during a widget creation, deployed to any page of the platform (e.g., dashboards), and accessed during normal operations. The vulnerability resides in the `ImageController`, which fails to restrict the execution of JavaScript code when an image is loaded by the user's browser. This vulnerability can lead to the execution of malicious code in the context of other users' sessions, potentially compromising their accounts and allowing unauthorized actions.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.2
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to to verify that the token used during the code exchange originates from the same authentication flow, which allows an authenticated user to perform account takeover via a specially crafted email address used when switching authentication methods and sending a request to the /users/login/sso/code-exchange endpoint. The vulnerability requires ExperimentalEnableAuthenticationTransfer to be enabled (default: enabled) and RequireEmailVerification to be disabled (default: disabled).

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 9.9
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
Description

Mattermost versions 11.0.x <= 11.0.2, 10.12.x <= 10.12.1, 10.11.x <= 10.11.4, 10.5.x <= 10.5.12 fail to sanitize team email addresses to be visible only to Team Admins, which allows any authenticated user to view team email addresses via the GET /api/v4/channels/{channel_id}/common_teams endpoint

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 4.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
Description

Exposure of email service credentials to users without administrative rights in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Devolutions Server: before 2025.2.21, before 2025.3.9.

Description

Exposure of credentials in unintended requests in Devolutions Server.This issue affects Server: through 2025.2.20, through 2025.3.8.