Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Eurofins CDMO AlphoraEurofins CDMO Alphora
VS
Bristol Myers SquibbBristol Myers Squibb
Eurofins CDMO Alphora

Eurofins CDMO Alphora

2240 Speakman Dr, Mississauga, Ontario L5K 1A9, CA

Last Update: 09/12/2025

View Profile
753/1000Fair

Eurofins CDMO Alphora Inc. is a Canadian contract development and manufacturing organization (CDMO) providing integrated solutions for pre-clinical and clinical services in Drug Substance (Active Pharmaceutical Ingredient), Drug Product, Solid State Research & Developme...

NAICS:325
NAICS Definition:N/A
Employees:172
Subsidiaries:30
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Bristol Myers Squibb

Bristol Myers Squibb

3401 Princeton Pike, Lawrence Township, 08648, US

Last Update: 20/05/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://www.bms.com
806/1000Good

At Bristol Myers Squibb, we work every day to transform patients’ lives through science. That work inspires some of the most interesting, meaningful, and life-changing careers you’ll experience. Join us and pursue innovative ideas alongside some of the brightest minds i...

NAICS:3254
NAICS Definition:Pharmaceutical and Medicine Manufacturing
Employees:38,258
Subsidiaries:1
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
2

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Eurofins CDMO Alphora

Eurofins CDMO Alphora

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Bristol Myers Squibb

Bristol Myers Squibb

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Eurofins CDMO Alphora in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Pharmaceutical Manufacturing Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Bristol Myers Squibb in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Eurofins CDMO Alphora (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Eurofins CDMO Alphora cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Bristol Myers Squibb (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Bristol Myers Squibb cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Eurofins CDMO Alphora

Eurofins CDMO Alphora

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Bristol Myers Squibb

Bristol Myers Squibb

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
BRI533080525
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
ERT18610523
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
IQV125614222

FAQ

Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora company and Bristol Myers Squibb company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora and Bristol Myers Squibb, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora and Bristol Myers Squibb, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Eurofins CDMO Alphora or Bristol Myers Squibb ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Eurofins CDMO Alphora or Bristol Myers Squibb ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora and Bristol Myers Squibb, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Eurofins CDMO Alphora and Bristol Myers Squibb, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-48777
SUMMARY

FileBrowser Quantum is a free, self-hosted, web-based file manager. Versions prior to 1.3.2-stable, 1.4.0-beta and 1.4.1-beta are vulnerable to Path Traversal through the publicPatchHandler in backend/http/public.go which joins user-controlled fromPath and toPath body fields with the trusted d.share.Path BEFORE the downstream sanitizer runs. Because filepath.Join collapses .. segments during the join, the sanitizer in resourcePatchHandler never sees the traversal and the move/copy/rename operates on a path outside the shared directory. The same root-cause pattern was patched for the bulk DELETE endpoint as CVE-2026-44542 (GHSA-fwj3-42wh-8673), but the PATCH handler with the identical pattern was not updated. A public share link with AllowModify=true is sufficient to exploit this. Anyone holding such a link can move, copy, or rename arbitrary files within the share owner's source root. This issue has been fixed in versions 1.3.3-stable and 1.4.2-beta.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 9.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-47750
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the GLOBAL opcode handler. The issue was caused by missing validation when searching for newline-delimited fields. A crafted .ckpt file without the expected newline could cause the parser to use -1 as a copy length, resulting in immediate heap corruption. The attack requires the victim or application to load a .ckpt file from an untrusted source, such as a downloaded model from a model sharing site. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by following these instructions: do not load .ckpt checkpoint files from untrusted sources, and prefer trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-47747
SUMMARY

stable-diffusion.cpp is a pure C/C++ library for running diffusion model (Stable Diffusion, Flux, Wan, Qwen Image, Z-Image, and more) inference. In versions prior to master-584-0a7ae07, the pickle .ckpt parser in src/model.cpp contained a heap buffer overflow vulnerability in the BINUNICODE opcode handler. The issue was caused by sign confusion on the opcode length field. A crafted .ckpt file could trigger memcpy with a very large length derived from a negative signed value, causing immediate heap corruption. The issue has been resolved in version master-584-0a7ae07. If developers are unable to immediately update their applications they can work around this issue by only loading .ckpt checkpoint files from trusted sources and preferring trusted model sources and safer formats such as .safetensors where possible.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-46448
SUMMARY

In OpenStack Nova before 33.0.2, the server create API does not strip certain hint data. The resulting instance has no Placement allocation.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-22313
SUMMARY

The device has a webserver that exposes a REST API authenticated with a token on the management network. By exploiting an OS command injection vulnerability an authenticated attacker can send arbitrary commands to the device that are executed with administrative permissions by the underlying operating system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-06-16
UPDATED
Date2026-06-16
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3