Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CDK GlobalCDK Global
VS
[24]7.ai[24]7.ai
CDK Global

CDK Global

11809 Domain Drive, Suite 200, Austin, Texas, US, 78758

Last Update: 31/03/2026

View Profile
Between 700 and 749
http://www.cdkglobal.com/
735/1000Moderate

CDK Global is a leading provider of retail technology and software as a service (SaaS) solutions that help dealers and auto manufacturers run their businesses more efficiently, drive improved profitability and create frictionless purchasing and ownership experiences for...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:8,285
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
1
Attack type number
1
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

2105 S Bascom Ave, Campbell, 95008, US

Last Update: 13/09/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
https://www.247.ai/
778/1000Fair

[24]7.ai™ customer engagement solutions use conversational artificial intelligence to understand customer intent, enabling companies to create personalized, predictive, and effortless customer experiences across all channels; attract and retain customers; boost agent pr...

NAICS:5112
NAICS Definition:Software Publishers
Employees:11,282
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CDK Global

CDK Global

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDK Global in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Software Development Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for [24]7.ai in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CDK Global (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDK Global cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - [24]7.ai (X = Date, Y = Severity)

[24]7.ai cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CDK Global

CDK Global

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Breach
CDK047072825
[24]7.ai

[24]7.ai

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CDK Global company and [24]7.ai company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CDK Global and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CDK Global and [24]7.ai, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CDK Global or [24]7.ai ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CDK Global or [24]7.ai ?
Between CDK Global and [24]7.ai, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CDK Global and [24]7.ai, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-85893
SUMMARY

Use after free in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-69486
SUMMARY

Heap-based buffer overflow in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to execute code over a network.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2025-11395
SUMMARY

A flaw was found in Podman. If an attacker can pass a crafted tar archive to the `podman load` command, they can create files on the host machine with the privileges of the user running Podman.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1
CVE-2026-92259
SUMMARY

Integer overflow or wraparound vulnerability in Samsung Opensource Escargot allows attackers with write access to the bytecode-cache directory to cause a heap-based buffer overflow and denial of service via a crafted cache file. This issue affects Escargot: ac94df78493ee6fede286620d94f724e46b4d238.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:L/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.8
CVE-2026-92257
SUMMARY

Netcore NR255-V version 1.5.130703 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in L7 content management pages that use eval() sinks, affecting the call board text and policy group handling components. Attackers can inject persistent script payloads through these pages to have malicious code executed in the context of other users viewing the affected content.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-15
UPDATED
Date2026-09-15
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:P/VC:L/VI:L/VA:N/SC:L/SI:L/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.3