Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial SupportCDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support
VS
Secretaría de Educación PúblicaSecretaría de Educación Pública
CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support

CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support

Atlanta, US

Last Update: 08/02/2026

View Profile

This account is no longer active, and our content has moved to https://www.linkedin.com/company/centers-for-disease-control-and-prevention

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:None
Subsidiaries:4
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
Secretaría de Educación Pública

Secretaría de Educación Pública

MX

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 850 and 899
https://onlinecareer360.com/
850/1000Very Good

MISIÓN/PROPÓSITO: La SEP tiene como propósito esencial crear condiciones que permitan asegurar el acceso de todas las mexicanas y mexicanos a una educación de calidad, en el nivel y modalidad que la requieran y en el lugar donde la demanden. VISIÓN: En el año 2025,...

NAICS:92
NAICS Definition:Public Administration
Employees:152,762
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support

CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Secretaría de Educación Pública

Secretaría de Educación Pública

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Secretaría de Educación Pública in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Secretaría de Educación Pública (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Secretaría de Educación Pública cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support

CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
Secretaría de Educación Pública

Secretaría de Educación Pública

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support company and Secretaría de Educación Pública company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support and Secretaría de Educación Pública, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support and Secretaría de Educación Pública, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support or Secretaría de Educación Pública ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support or Secretaría de Educación Pública ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support and Secretaría de Educación Pública, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CDC State, Tribal, Local, & Territorial Support and Secretaría de Educación Pública, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-16174
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified about a potential gap in Netskope Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) running on Windows systems. Successful exploitation of the gap could potentially allow a privileged user to send a crafted message to the EPDLP process port to trigger an integer overflow, leading to memory corruption. Successful exploitation would require the EPDLP module to be enabled in the client configuration, and that Memory Integrity is disabled. A successful exploit could potentially result in a denial-of-service, arbitrary code execution, or privilege escalation on the local machine.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 8.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:P/PR:H/UI:N/VC:H/VI:H/VA:H/SC:H/SI:H/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-16172
SUMMARY

Netskope was notified of an out-of-bounds heap read affecting the Endpoint DLP (EPDLP) service of the Netskope Client. A local standard user could potentially send a specially crafted message that is not properly validated with a bounds check, likely crashing the kernel driver handler. Successful exploitation could potentially crash the EPDLP service, temporarily interrupting DLP enforcement. A successful exploit could potentially also reveal per-boot memory layout information to unauthorized users.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: )
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.0
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:L/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:H/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
NA
EXPLOITABILITY
NA
CVE-2026-87958
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 is vulnerable to a denial of service where a specific functionality on a Db2 server can be disabled by a privileged user under certain conditions.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
CVE-2026-86093
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an attacker with the ability to control or impersonate a DRDA server endpoint to execute arbitrary commands on Db2 clients due to a stack-based buffer overflow that improperly copies user-controlled data into a fixed-size stack buffer without bounds checking.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.5
Complexity: HIGH
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
1.6
CVE-2026-86087
SUMMARY

IBM Db2 11.5.0 through 11.5.9, and 12.1.0 through 12.1.5 could allow an authenticated user to send a specially crafted request to write arbitrary files on the system.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-09-10
UPDATED
Date2026-09-10
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8