Comparison Overview
The Center for Community Media

The Center for Community Media
Craig Newmark Graduate School of Journalism at CUNY , New York , 10018, US
Last Update: 06/12/2025
The mission of CCM is to serve news organizations that provide essential local coverage for populations whose voices and issues are underrepresented in mainstream media. The Center serves as a hub of information, resources, and training aimed at increasing the sustainab...

Cambridge University Press & Assessment
Shaftesbury Road, Cambridge, England, GB, CB2 8
Last Update: 01/04/2026
We are Cambridge University Press & Assessment. We are a world-leading academic publisher and assessment organisation, and part of the University of Cambridge. We’re driven by a simple mission – to contribute to society through the pursuit of education, learning, and ...
Compliance Ranges Comparison

The Center for Community Media







Cambridge University Press & Assessment






Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals
Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for The Center for Community Media in 2026.
Incidents vs Education Industry Avg (This Year)
No incidents recorded for Cambridge University Press & Assessment in 2026.
Incident History - The Center for Community Media (X = Date, Y = Severity)
The Center for Community Media cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Incident History - Cambridge University Press & Assessment (X = Date, Y = Severity)
Cambridge University Press & Assessment cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.
Notable Incidents

The Center for Community Media

Cambridge University Press & Assessment
FAQ
Latest Global CVEs
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains a path traversal vulnerability in MultiAgentMonitor that fails to sanitize agent IDs when building file paths. Attackers can include traversal sequences like ../ in agent IDs to read, write, or overwrite arbitrary files, enabling sensitive disclosure, denial of service, or code execution.
PraisonAI before 1.5.115 contains an information disclosure vulnerability in the MultiAgentLedger component that allows attackers to access sensitive data by registering agents with duplicate IDs. Attackers can exploit the lack of agent ID uniqueness enforcement to share ledger instances and expose system prompts and conversation history between agents.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 contains a cross-origin agent execution vulnerability in the AGUI endpoint that allows remote attackers to trigger arbitrary agent execution. The POST /agui endpoint lacks authentication and hardcodes Access-Control-Allow-Origin: * headers, combined with Starlette's Content-Type-agnostic JSON parsing, enabling attackers to bypass CORS preflight checks via simple requests and exfiltrate sensitive agent responses including tool execution results and environment data.
PraisonAI before 4.5.128 contains an arbitrary shell command execution vulnerability where the UI modules hardcode approval_mode to auto, overriding administrator configuration from PRAISON_APPROVAL_MODE environment variable. Authenticated attackers can instruct the LLM agent to execute arbitrary shell commands via subprocess.run with shell=True, bypassing the manual approval gate and insufficient command sanitization blocklists.
PraisonAI before 1.5.128 caches tool approval decisions by tool name only, not by invocation arguments, allowing subsequent execute_command calls to bypass approval prompts. Attackers can exploit this by obtaining initial approval for a benign command, then silently exfiltrate API keys and credentials via subsequent shell commands without user consent.