Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

CCleanerCCleaner
VS
Diebold NixdorfDiebold Nixdorf
CCleaner

CCleaner

London, GB

Last Update: 12/08/2026

View Profile
Between 750 and 799
http://www.ccleaner.com
792/1000Fair

CCleaner is part of Gen™ (NASDAQ: GEN), a global company dedicated to powering Digital Freedom with a family of trusted consumer brands.

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:14
Subsidiaries:11
12-month incidents
1
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
1
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

350 Orchard Ave NE, North Canton, 44720, US

Last Update: 05/09/2026

View Profile
Between 650 and 699
http://DieboldNixdorf.com
681/1000Weak

Diebold Nixdorf automates, digitizes and transforms the way people bank and shop. Its integrated solutions connect digital and physical channels conveniently, securely and efficiently for millions of consumers every day. As an innovation partner for nearly all of the ...

NAICS:5415
NAICS Definition:Computer Systems Design and Related Services
Employees:20,251
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
3

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
CCleaner

CCleaner

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

CCleaner has 31.51% fewer incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incidents

Incidents vs IT Services and IT Consulting Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Diebold Nixdorf in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - CCleaner (X = Date, Y = Severity)

CCleaner cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - Diebold Nixdorf (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Diebold Nixdorf cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
CCleaner

CCleaner

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
CCL1786525619
Diebold Nixdorf

Diebold Nixdorf

Incidents
🔒 Incident : Ransomware
DIE1772015252
🔒 Incident : Vulnerability
DIE000081024
🔒 Incident : Cyber Attack
DIE84429723

FAQ

Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between CCleaner company and Diebold Nixdorf company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between CCleaner and Diebold Nixdorf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between CCleaner and Diebold Nixdorf, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - CCleaner or Diebold Nixdorf ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - CCleaner or Diebold Nixdorf ?
Between CCleaner and Diebold Nixdorf, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between CCleaner and Diebold Nixdorf, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-96451
SUMMARY

Authorization Bypass Through User-Controlled Key vulnerability in Ultimate Member Ultimate Member ultimate-member allows Privilege Escalation.This issue affects Ultimate Member: from n/a through 2.13.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.8)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.8
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.9
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103342
SUMMARY

Improper Neutralization of Input During Web Page Generation ('Cross-site Scripting') vulnerability in Unlimited Elements Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates) unlimited-elements-for-elementor allows Reflected XSS.This issue affects Unlimited Elements For Elementor (Free Widgets, Addons, Templates): from n/a through 2.0.20.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 7.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 7.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:L
IMPACT SCORE
3.7
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-103065
SUMMARY

Improper Validation of Specified Quantity in Input vulnerability in Themeum Kirki kirki allows Accessing Functionality Not Properly Constrained by ACLs.This issue affects Kirki: from n/a through 6.3.1.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 8.2)
CVSS3
Base Score: 8.2
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
4.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105122
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows attackers able to register or modify OAuth 2.0 clients to make OpenAM fetch internal resources via an unvalidated jwks_uri. Attackers can trigger unauthenticated fetches through client-authentication and ID-token validation to probe internal hosts, metadata endpoints or local files, or exhaust request threads for denial of service.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.4)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.4
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:L
CVSS4
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:L/UI:N/VC:L/VI:N/VA:L/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
2.8
REFERENCES
CVE-2026-105121
SUMMARY

OpenAM before 16.1.3 contains an improper authorization vulnerability that allows delegated administrators to destroy sessions outside their realms because realm checks use the requester's realm. Authenticated accounts holding the iplanet-am-session-destroy-sessions attribute can supply a target session identifier or handle to forcibly log out users in any realm.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-10-03
UPDATED
Date2026-10-03
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 4.9)
CVSS3
Base Score: 4.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:H/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
CVSS4
Base Score: 6.9
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:H/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
1.2
REFERENCES