Rankiteo Logo
Rankiteo
Leader in Cyber Underwriting
Loading...
NEWRankiteo Cyber Underwriting Desktop - Score, price, and bind from your desktop
WindowsmacOSLinux
Download

Comparison Overview

Corndel College London (CCL)Corndel College London (CCL)
VS
The University of GeorgiaThe University of Georgia
Corndel College London (CCL)

Corndel College London (CCL)

5th Floor, 80 Old Street, London, London, GB, EC1V 9AZ

Last Update: 26/01/2026

View Profile
769/1000Fair

Founded by the multi award-winning management and digital skills provider Corndel, CCL delivers a radical approach to traditional learning. We align education with industry demands to equip students with the relevant skills, knowledge and experiences that will make th...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:32
Subsidiaries:0
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0
The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

Administration Building, Athens, GA, US, 30602

Last Update: 02/04/2026

View Profile
Between 800 and 849
http://uga.edu
802/1000Good

The University of Georgia, a land-grant and sea-grant university with state-wide commitments and responsibilities, is the state's flagship institution of higher education. It is also the state's oldest, most comprehensive and most diversified institution of higher educa...

NAICS:6113
NAICS Definition:Colleges, Universities, and Professional Schools
Employees:17,275
Subsidiaries:6
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
0
Attack type number
0

Compliance Ranges Comparison

Based On Specific Ai Models Category
Corndel College London (CCL)

Corndel College London (CCL)

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA
The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

-
ISO 27001Not verified
ISO 27001
-
SOC2 Type 1Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
-
SOC2 Type 2Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
-
GDPRNot verified
GDPR
-
PCI DSSNot verified
PCI DSS
-
HIPAANot verified
HIPAA

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Corndel College London (CCL) in 2026.

Incidents

Incidents vs Higher Education Industry Avg (This Year)

No incidents recorded for The University of Georgia in 2026.

Incidents

Incident History - Corndel College London (CCL) (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Corndel College London (CCL) cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Incident History - The University of Georgia (X = Date, Y = Severity)

The University of Georgia cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries.

No timeline data available
R - Ransomware
C - Cyber Attack
D - Data Breach
V - Vulnerability

Notable Incidents

Last Cyber / HR Incidents / Global...
Corndel College London (CCL)

Corndel College London (CCL)

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.
The University of Georgia

The University of Georgia

Incidents
No explicit notable incidents reported.

FAQ

Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has the best AI Cybersecurity Score ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents in the past ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has experienced more cyber incidents this year ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has experienced at least one ransomware attack ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has experienced at least one data breach ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has experienced at least one targeted cyberattack ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has experienced at least one vulnerability ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one holds the most compliance certifications ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one holds the fewest compliance certifications ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has the most subsidiaries ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) company and The University of Georgia company, which one has the largest number of employees ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) and The University of Georgia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 1 certifications ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) and The University of Georgia, which company holds both SOC 2 Type 2 certifications ?
Which company is ISO 27001 certified - Corndel College London (CCL) or The University of Georgia ?
Which company is PCI DSS compliant - Corndel College London (CCL) or The University of Georgia ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) and The University of Georgia, which company complies with HIPAA regulations for healthcare data ?
Between Corndel College London (CCL) and The University of Georgia, which company complies with GDPR requirements ?

Latest Global CVEs

CVE-2026-66064
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/handler.go sendFile handler opened files using a cleaned path but derived the authorization filename from raw req.URL.Path, so a trailing slash could bypass .goshs ACL-file protection and block-list checks. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.3)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.3
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:N/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
1.4
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-66063
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.5, the httpserver/updown.go multipart upload handler split part.FileName() on / but did not reject .., allowing an unauthenticated upload with filename .. to create a file outside the served tree. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.5.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 6.5)
CVSS3
Base Score: 6.5
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:L/I:L/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
2.5
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-64863
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. Prior to 2.1.4, the httpserver/server.go wdGuard handled WebDAV MOVE as a write-only method and did not enforce --no-delete, allowing WebDAV clients to delete or overwrite files via MOVE with Overwrite: T. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:H
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-62325
SUMMARY

goshs is a feature-rich single-binary file server for red teamers and developers. From 2.1.3 until 2.1.4, the sftpserver/sftpserver.go password handler used Username != "" && Password != "", so running goshs with -b 'admin:' -sftp and no -fkf left both SFTP authentication handlers unset and allowed unauthenticated file access. This issue is fixed in version 2.1.4.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 9.1)
CVSS3
Base Score: 9.1
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
5.2
EXPLOITABILITY
3.9
CVE-2026-59921
SUMMARY

Netty is an asynchronous, event-driven network application framework. Prior to versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final, HttpPostRequestEncoder constructs multipart HTTP request bodies by directly concatenating user-supplied filenames and field names into Content-Disposition MIME headers without validating or sanitizing CRLF characters (\r\n). Since MIME headers are delimited by CRLF, an attacker who controls the filename can inject arbitrary MIME headers into the multipart body part. The root cause is that neither the encoder nor the FileUpload implementations' setFilename() methods, which only check for null, neutralize CRLF characters before the filename is embedded into the header. This issue has been fixed in versions 4.1.136.Final and 4.2.16.Final.

PUBLISHED
Date2026-07-28
UPDATED
Date2026-07-28
RISK INFORMATION (Score: 5.7)
CVSS3
Base Score: 5.7
Complexity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:A/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:H/A:N
IMPACT SCORE
3.6
EXPLOITABILITY
2.1