Comparison Overview

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada

VS

FEMA

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada

undefined, Ottawa, undefined, undefined, CA
Last Update: 2025-11-22
Between 700 and 749

The Canada Border Services Agency (CBSA) ensures Canada's security and prosperity by facilitating and overseeing international travel and trade across Canada's border. Terms of Use: http://ow.ly/g7xq30ldyN6 --- L'Agence des services frontaliers du Canada (ASFC) contribue à la sécurité et à la prospérité des Canadiens en facilitant et en surveillant les déplacements et les échanges commerciaux internationaux à la frontière du Canada. Modalités d'utilisation : http://ow.ly/FUrv30r6n71

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 4,341
Subsidiaries: 60
12-month incidents
0
Known data breaches
5
Attack type number
3

FEMA

500 C Street SW, None, Washington, DC, US, 20472
Last Update: 2025-11-20
Between 550 and 599

Welcome to the official LinkedIn page for the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA). When disaster strikes, America looks to FEMA to support survivors and first responders in communities all across the country. This page provides career related information, job announcements and relevant updates for the agency’s current and future workforce. FEMA fosters innovation, rewards performance and creativity, and provides challenges on a routine basis with a well-skilled, knowledgeable, and high performance workforce. Join our mission to support Americans when they need you most!

NAICS: 92
NAICS Definition: Public Administration
Employees: 19,641
Subsidiaries: 10
12-month incidents
3
Known data breaches
9
Attack type number
5

Compliance Badges Comparison

Security & Compliance Standards Overview

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbsa-asfc.jpeg
Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fema.jpeg
FEMA
ISO 27001
ISO 27001 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 1
SOC2 Type 1 certification not verified
Not verified
SOC2 Type 2
SOC2 Type 2 certification not verified
Not verified
GDPR
GDPR certification not verified
Not verified
PCI DSS
PCI DSS certification not verified
Not verified
HIPAA
HIPAA certification not verified
Not verified
Compliance Summary
Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
100%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified
FEMA
0%
Compliance Rate
0/4 Standards Verified

Benchmark & Cyber Underwriting Signals

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

No incidents recorded for Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada in 2025.

Incidents vs Government Administration Industry Average (This Year)

FEMA has 361.54% more incidents than the average of same-industry companies with at least one recorded incident.

Incident History — Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada (X = Date, Y = Severity)

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Incident History — FEMA (X = Date, Y = Severity)

FEMA cyber incidents detection timeline including parent company and subsidiaries

Notable Incidents

Last 3 Security & Risk Events by Company

https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/cbsa-asfc.jpeg
Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada
Incidents

Date Detected: 10/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 5/2025
Type:Breach
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 10/2022
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Unpatched and decommissioned server
Blog: Blog
https://images.rankiteo.com/companyimages/fema.jpeg
FEMA
Incidents

Date Detected: 9/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement, Privilege Escalation
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft, Potential Sabotage
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 7/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Exploitation of Citrix Remote Access Software, Lateral Movement within Network
Motivation: Espionage, Data Theft
Blog: Blog

Date Detected: 6/2025
Type:Breach
Attack Vector: Compromised Credentials, Exploitation of Citrix Remote Desktop Software, Lateral Movement via VPN Software
Blog: Blog

FAQ

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company demonstrates a stronger AI Cybersecurity Score compared to FEMA company, reflecting its advanced cybersecurity posture governance and monitoring frameworks.

FEMA company has faced a higher number of disclosed cyber incidents historically compared to Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company.

In the current year, FEMA company has reported more cyber incidents than Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company.

FEMA company has confirmed experiencing a ransomware attack, while Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Both FEMA company and Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company have disclosed experiencing at least one data breach.

Both FEMA company and Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company have reported experiencing targeted cyberattacks.

FEMA company has disclosed at least one vulnerability, while Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has not reported such incidents publicly.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds any compliance certifications.

Neither company holds any compliance certifications.

Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company has more subsidiaries worldwide compared to FEMA company.

FEMA company employs more people globally than Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada company, reflecting its scale as a Government Administration.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds SOC 2 Type 1 certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds SOC 2 Type 2 certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds ISO 27001 certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds PCI DSS certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds HIPAA certification.

Neither Canada Border Services Agency | Agence des services frontaliers du Canada nor FEMA holds GDPR certification.

Latest Global CVEs (Not Company-Specific)

Description

Angular is a development platform for building mobile and desktop web applications using TypeScript/JavaScript and other languages. Prior to versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1, there is a XSRF token leakage via protocol-relative URLs in angular HTTP clients. The vulnerability is a Credential Leak by App Logic that leads to the unauthorized disclosure of the Cross-Site Request Forgery (XSRF) token to an attacker-controlled domain. Angular's HttpClient has a built-in XSRF protection mechanism that works by checking if a request URL starts with a protocol (http:// or https://) to determine if it is cross-origin. If the URL starts with protocol-relative URL (//), it is incorrectly treated as a same-origin request, and the XSRF token is automatically added to the X-XSRF-TOKEN header. This issue has been patched in versions 19.2.16, 20.3.14, and 21.0.1. A workaround for this issue involves avoiding using protocol-relative URLs (URLs starting with //) in HttpClient requests. All backend communication URLs should be hardcoded as relative paths (starting with a single /) or fully qualified, trusted absolute URLs.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 7.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:N/SC:H/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft deep ASN.1 structures that trigger unbounded recursive parsing. This leads to a Denial-of-Service (DoS) via stack exhaustion when parsing untrusted DER inputs. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 8.7
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:N/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:N/VA:H/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Forge (also called `node-forge`) is a native implementation of Transport Layer Security in JavaScript. An Integer Overflow vulnerability in node-forge versions 1.3.1 and below enables remote, unauthenticated attackers to craft ASN.1 structures containing OIDs with oversized arcs. These arcs may be decoded as smaller, trusted OIDs due to 32-bit bitwise truncation, enabling the bypass of downstream OID-based security decisions. This issue has been patched in version 1.3.2.

Risk Information
cvss4
Base: 6.3
Severity: LOW
CVSS:4.0/AV:N/AC:L/AT:P/PR:N/UI:N/VC:N/VI:L/VA:N/SC:N/SI:N/SA:N/E:X/CR:X/IR:X/AR:X/MAV:X/MAC:X/MAT:X/MPR:X/MUI:X/MVC:X/MVI:X/MVA:X/MSC:X/MSI:X/MSA:X/S:X/AU:X/R:X/V:X/RE:X/U:X
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. Prior to versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2, working with large buffers in Lua scripts can lead to a stack overflow. Users of Lua rules and output scripts may be affected when working with large buffers. This includes a rule passing a large buffer to a Lua script. This issue has been patched in versions 7.0.13 and 8.0.2. A workaround for this issue involves disabling Lua rules and output scripts, or making sure limits, such as stream.depth.reassembly and HTTP response body limits (response-body-limit), are set to less than half the stack size.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H
Description

Suricata is a network IDS, IPS and NSM engine developed by the OISF (Open Information Security Foundation) and the Suricata community. In versions from 8.0.0 to before 8.0.2, a NULL dereference can occur when the entropy keyword is used in conjunction with base64_data. This issue has been patched in version 8.0.2. A workaround involves disabling rules that use entropy in conjunction with base64_data.

Risk Information
cvss3
Base: 7.5
Severity: LOW
CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:H